PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEM vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AEM vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEM achieves a -3.66% return, which is significantly lower than IAU's -2.44% return. Over the past 10 years, AEM has outperformed IAU with an annualized return of 14.70%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively lower 12.31% annualized return.


AEM

1D
3.09%
1M
-16.80%
YTD
-3.66%
6M
-2.93%
1Y
34.46%
3Y*
50.92%
5Y*
20.78%
10Y*
14.70%

IAU

1D
0.08%
1M
-10.21%
YTD
-2.44%
6M
-2.22%
1Y
23.95%
3Y*
29.07%
5Y*
17.23%
10Y*
12.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEM vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
-3.66%119.53%46.04%8.98%1.08%-22.81%17.39%54.18%-11.51%10.92%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
-2.44%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between AEM and IAU is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2005

0.69

The correlation between AEM and IAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEM vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEM
AEM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
AEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEM vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AEMIAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.19

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

0.99

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.48

2.83

-0.35

AEM vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEM and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AEM vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEM drawdown since its inception was -90.49%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEM and IAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEMIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.49%

-45.14%

-45.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.39%

-24.40%

-14.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.39%

-24.40%

-14.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.03%

-24.40%

-20.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.86%

-24.40%

-29.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.35%

-22.03%

-13.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.65%

-15.97%

-30.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.93%

8.47%

+5.46%

Volatility

AEM vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) has a higher volatility of 15.31% compared to iShares Gold Trust (IAU) at 7.70%. This indicates that AEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEMIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.31%

7.70%

+7.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.02%

23.94%

+12.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.06%

27.17%

+16.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.06%

18.16%

+18.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.35%

16.02%

+21.33%

Dividends

AEM vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.05%0.94%2.05%2.92%3.08%2.63%2.36%0.89%1.09%0.89%0.86%1.22%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AEM and IAU have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AEM has higher volatility (15.31%) compared to IAU (7.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEM dropped -90.49% vs IAU's -45.14%.

IAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEM and IAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer