PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEIS vs. FNGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AEIS vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (AEIS) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEIS achieves a 69.36% return, which is significantly higher than FNGU's 3.96% return.


AEIS

1D
4.10%
1M
9.59%
YTD
69.36%
6M
64.87%
1Y
189.09%
3Y*
48.70%
5Y*
28.11%
10Y*
25.27%

FNGU

1D
-2.52%
1M
-13.99%
YTD
3.96%
6M
-3.67%
1Y
25.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEIS vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AEIS and FNGU is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEIS vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEIS
AEIS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AEIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEIS Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
AEIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEIS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGU
FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEIS vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (AEIS) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AEISFNGUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.11

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.48

0.36

+7.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.74

0.85

+23.88

AEIS vs. FNGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEIS Sharpe Ratio is 3.50, which is higher than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEIS and FNGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AEIS vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEIS drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, which is greater than FNGU's maximum drawdown of -61.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEIS and FNGU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEISFNGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.51%

-61.30%

-31.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.24%

-59.55%

+35.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.89%

-27.36%

+18.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.29%

-22.25%

-30.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.32%

24.91%

-17.59%

Volatility

AEIS vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (AEIS) is 20.80%, while MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) has a volatility of 27.31%. This indicates that AEIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEISFNGUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.80%

27.31%

-6.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.81%

50.15%

-8.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.83%

61.43%

-9.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.21%

79.93%

-36.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.56%

79.93%

-35.37%

Dividends

AEIS vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

AEIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AEIS
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
0.11%0.19%0.35%0.37%0.47%0.44%
FNGU
MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AEIS and FNGU have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNGU has higher volatility (27.31%) compared to AEIS (20.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEIS dropped -92.51% vs FNGU's -61.30%.

AEIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEIS and FNGU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer