PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADVE vs. ASIA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ADVE vs. ASIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) and Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADVE achieves a 22.27% return, which is significantly lower than ASIA's 35.29% return.


ADVE

1D
1.38%
1M
5.22%
YTD
22.27%
6M
24.39%
1Y
42.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ASIA

1D
1.01%
1M
14.04%
YTD
35.29%
6M
39.74%
1Y
69.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADVE vs. ASIA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ADVE
Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
22.27%26.12%7.02%5.13%
ASIA
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
35.29%32.06%3.41%0.01%

Correlation

The correlation between ADVE and ASIA is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2023

0.86

The correlation between ADVE and ASIA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

ADVE vs. ASIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ADVE
ASIA

Technology

29.0%
46.6%

Financial Services

27.3%
17.6%

Industrials

13.6%
11.6%

Communication Services

9.5%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
7.5%

Real Estate

4.0%
2.9%

Basic Materials

3.4%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
1.1%

Energy

1.2%
2.1%

Utilities

1.1%

-

Healthcare

1.1%
4.0%

Technology

ADVE
29.0%
ASIA
46.6%

Financial Services

ADVE
27.3%
ASIA
17.6%

Industrials

ADVE
13.6%
ASIA
11.6%

Communication Services

ADVE
9.5%
ASIA
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ADVE
6.9%
ASIA
7.5%

Real Estate

ADVE
4.0%
ASIA
2.9%

Basic Materials

ADVE
3.4%
ASIA
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

ADVE
2.9%
ASIA
1.1%

Energy

ADVE
1.2%
ASIA
2.1%

Utilities

ADVE
1.1%
ASIA

-

Healthcare

ADVE
1.1%
ASIA
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADVE vs. ASIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADVE
ADVE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ADVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADVE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ADVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADVE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

ASIA
ASIA Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ASIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASIA Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ASIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASIA Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADVE vs. ASIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) and Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADVEASIADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.52

3.24

-0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.50

3.93

-0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.58

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

4.87

-1.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.74

18.15

-3.41

ADVE vs. ASIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADVE Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the ASIA Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADVE and ASIA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADVEASIADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

3.24

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.46

1.28

+0.18

Drawdowns

ADVE vs. ASIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADVE drawdown since its inception was -18.41%, smaller than the maximum ASIA drawdown of -23.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADVE and ASIA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADVEASIADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.41%

-23.95%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

-14.47%

+2.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.15%

-4.86%

+1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

3.88%

-0.93%

Volatility

ADVE vs. ASIA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) is 5.98%, while Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) has a volatility of 9.73%. This indicates that ADVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADVEASIADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

9.73%

-3.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.40%

18.50%

-4.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.88%

21.51%

-4.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.69%

20.23%

-4.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

20.23%

-4.54%

ADVE vs. ASIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ADVE and ASIA have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

ADVE vs. ASIA - Dividend Comparison

ADVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than ASIA's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ADVE
Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
2.44%2.97%6.00%0.37%
ASIA
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
0.77%1.05%0.58%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


ADVE and ASIA have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASIA has higher volatility (9.73%) compared to ADVE (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADVE dropped -18.41% vs ASIA's -23.95%.

On 1-year performance, ASIA leads with 69.27% vs 42.25% for ADVE. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, ADVE has been the lower-risk option at 5.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ASIA has performed better with a 69.27% return vs 42.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ADVE and ASIA have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

ADVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 0.77% for ASIA.

ASIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADVE and ASIA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer