PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADP vs. MDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ADP vs. MDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) and Medtronic plc (MDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADP achieves a -10.66% return, which is significantly higher than MDT's -15.83% return. Over the past 10 years, ADP has outperformed MDT with an annualized return of 12.40%, while MDT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.00% annualized return.


ADP

1D
0.96%
1M
9.25%
YTD
-10.66%
6M
-13.64%
1Y
-24.57%
3Y*
3.25%
5Y*
4.80%
10Y*
12.40%

MDT

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.24%
YTD
-15.83%
6M
-18.44%
1Y
-6.49%
3Y*
1.02%
5Y*
-5.47%
10Y*
2.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADP vs. MDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADP
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
-10.66%-10.18%28.41%-0.25%-1.29%42.60%5.86%32.71%14.25%16.54%
MDT
Medtronic plc
-15.83%24.05%0.28%9.58%-22.55%-9.79%5.70%27.34%15.18%15.90%

Correlation

The correlation between ADP and MDT is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 1983

0.35

The correlation between ADP and MDT shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.44 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ADP:

$91.00B

MDT:

$103.31B

EPS

ADP:

$10.72

MDT:

$3.58

PE Ratio

ADP:

21.10

MDT:

22.38

PEG Ratio

ADP:

1.59

MDT:

2.02

PS Ratio

ADP:

4.25

MDT:

2.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADP:

$21.60B

MDT:

$35.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADP:

$10.26B

MDT:

$5.78B

EBITDA (TTM)

ADP:

$6.51B

MDT:

$7.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADP vs. MDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADP
ADP Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ADP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADP Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
ADP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADP Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

MDT
MDT Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADP vs. MDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) and Medtronic plc (MDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ADPMDTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

0.96

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

-0.23

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

-0.56

-0.64

ADP vs. MDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADP Sharpe Ratio is -1.02, which is lower than the MDT Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADP and MDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ADP vs. MDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADP drawdown since its inception was -59.51%, roughly equal to the maximum MDT drawdown of -57.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADP and MDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADPMDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.51%

-57.63%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.16%

-28.90%

-9.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.78%

-28.90%

-11.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.78%

-45.10%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.78%

-45.10%

+4.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.50%

-31.23%

+2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.59%

-16.55%

+3.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.40%

11.52%

+8.88%

Volatility

ADP vs. MDT - Volatility Comparison

Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) and Medtronic plc (MDT) have volatilities of 9.18% and 9.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADPMDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.18%

9.32%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.54%

16.28%

+4.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.29%

21.07%

+3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.07%

21.93%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.49%

23.25%

+1.24%

Dividends

ADP vs. MDT - Dividend Comparison

ADP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than MDT's 3.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADP
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
3.62%2.46%1.96%2.21%1.83%1.55%2.08%1.92%2.14%2.00%2.10%2.36%
MDT
Medtronic plc
3.54%2.95%3.49%3.34%3.44%2.39%1.95%1.87%2.15%2.24%2.34%1.88%

Financials

ADP vs. MDT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Automatic Data Processing, Inc. and Medtronic plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B20222023202420252026
5.94B
9.02B
(ADP) Total Revenue
(MDT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ADP and MDT have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDT has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to ADP (9.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADP dropped -59.51% vs MDT's -57.63%.

MDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.31 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADP and MDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer