ADME vs. QTR
Compare and contrast key facts about Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR).
ADME and QTR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ADME is a passively managed fund by Aptus Capital Advisors that tracks the performance of the Aptus Behavioral Momentum Index. It was launched on Jun 8, 2016. QTR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. Both ADME and QTR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ADME vs. QTR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ADME vs. QTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | -3.52% | 10.28% | 22.11% | 15.42% | -21.80% | 5.94% |
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | -7.25% | 14.52% | 21.46% | 45.53% | -29.94% | 4.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADME achieves a -3.52% return, which is significantly higher than QTR's -7.25% return.
ADME
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- -4.50%
- YTD
- -3.52%
- 6M
- -2.99%
- 1Y
- 11.79%
- 3Y*
- 13.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- —
QTR
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- -5.65%
- YTD
- -7.25%
- 6M
- -6.08%
- 1Y
- 16.96%
- 3Y*
- 17.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ADME vs. QTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ADME has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QTR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ADME vs. QTR — Risk / Return Rank
ADME
QTR
ADME vs. QTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ADME | QTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 1.04 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 1.56 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.20 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 1.36 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.54 | 4.83 | +0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ADME | QTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.04 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.39 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between ADME and QTR is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ADME vs. QTR - Dividend Comparison
ADME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than QTR's 20.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 0.42% | 0.38% | 0.47% | 0.78% | 0.73% | 0.26% | 0.41% | 0.70% | 0.86% | 0.32% | 0.69% |
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 20.24% | 18.77% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.36% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ADME vs. QTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADME drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, smaller than the maximum QTR drawdown of -31.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADME and QTR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADME | QTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.49% | -31.72% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.99% | -12.29% | +3.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.44% | -10.69% | +5.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.05% | -9.10% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 3.45% | -1.26% |
Volatility
ADME vs. QTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is 4.03%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that ADME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ADME | QTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 4.90% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.59% | 10.80% | -3.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.91% | 16.44% | -2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.88% | 18.16% | -5.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 18.16% | -3.71% |