PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADM vs. TROW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ADM vs. TROW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADM achieves a 41.55% return, which is significantly higher than TROW's 8.69% return. Over the past 10 years, ADM has outperformed TROW with an annualized return of 9.94%, while TROW has yielded a comparatively lower 8.25% annualized return.


ADM

1D
1.70%
1M
-2.56%
YTD
41.55%
6M
35.61%
1Y
66.67%
3Y*
6.06%
5Y*
6.96%
10Y*
9.94%

TROW

1D
1.27%
1M
6.44%
YTD
8.69%
6M
7.38%
1Y
22.18%
3Y*
4.23%
5Y*
-6.62%
10Y*
8.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADM vs. TROW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
41.55%18.24%-27.52%-20.42%39.98%37.33%12.44%17.10%5.28%-9.48%
TROW
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
8.69%-4.67%9.68%3.35%-42.24%34.91%28.11%35.61%-9.75%43.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ADM and TROW is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 1989

0.30

The correlation between ADM and TROW shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.38 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ADM:

$38.84B

TROW:

$23.86B

EPS

ADM:

$2.23

TROW:

$9.80

PE Ratio

ADM:

35.93

TROW:

11.19

PS Ratio

ADM:

0.48

TROW:

3.26

PB Ratio

ADM:

1.70

TROW:

2.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADM:

$80.61B

TROW:

$7.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADM:

$4.70B

TROW:

$3.66B

EBITDA (TTM)

ADM:

$3.48B

TROW:

$2.87B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADM vs. TROW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADM
ADM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ADM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ADM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADM Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

TROW
TROW Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TROW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TROW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
TROW Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TROW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TROW Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADM vs. TROW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ADMTROWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.18

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.24

1.13

+4.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.45

2.77

+11.68

ADM vs. TROW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADM Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the TROW Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADM and TROW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ADM vs. TROW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADM drawdown since its inception was -68.01%, roughly equal to the maximum TROW drawdown of -67.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADM and TROW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADMTROWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.01%

-67.43%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.79%

-19.76%

+6.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.22%

-34.05%

-15.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.14%

-58.16%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.14%

-58.16%

+4.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.23%

-39.77%

+31.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.59%

-16.68%

-4.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.63%

8.02%

-3.39%

Volatility

ADM vs. TROW - Volatility Comparison

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) has a higher volatility of 7.74% compared to T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) at 4.34%. This indicates that ADM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TROW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADMTROWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.74%

4.34%

+3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.56%

17.09%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.30%

23.79%

+3.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.26%

30.47%

-2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.96%

30.00%

-3.04%

Dividends

ADM vs. TROW - Dividend Comparison

ADM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than TROW's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
2.57%3.55%3.96%2.49%1.72%2.19%2.86%3.02%3.27%3.19%2.63%3.05%
TROW
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
4.66%4.96%4.39%4.53%4.40%3.72%2.38%2.50%3.03%2.17%2.87%5.71%

Financials

ADM vs. TROW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
20.49B
1.86B
(ADM) Total Revenue
(TROW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ADM vs. TROW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
6.0%
0
Portfolio components
ADM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a gross profit of 1.22B and revenue of 20.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.0%.

TROW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ADM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported an operating income of 408.00M and revenue of 20.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.0%.

TROW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 680.50M and revenue of 1.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.7%.

ADM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a net income of 298.00M and revenue of 20.49B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.

TROW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. reported a net income of 562.00M and revenue of 1.86B, resulting in a net margin of 30.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ADM and TROW have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADM has higher volatility (7.74%) compared to TROW (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADM dropped -68.01% vs TROW's -67.43%.

ADM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADM and TROW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer