PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADM vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ADM vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADM achieves a 51.13% return, which is significantly higher than T's -7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, ADM has outperformed T with an annualized return of 10.16%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.10% annualized return.


ADM

1D
-0.27%
1M
14.07%
6M
33.30%
YTD
51.13%
1Y
62.47%
3Y*
4.83%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
10.16%
ALL TIME*
8.04%

T

1D
0.64%
1M
2.62%
6M
-2.84%
YTD
-7.04%
1Y
-13.37%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
2.10%
ALL TIME*
9.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADM vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
51.13%18.24%-27.52%-20.42%39.98%37.33%12.44%17.10%5.28%-9.48%
T
AT&T Inc.
-7.04%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between ADM and T is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984

0.28

The correlation between ADM and T shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.31 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ADM:

$41.29B

T:

$152.52B

EPS

ADM:

$2.23

T:

$3.05

PE Ratio

ADM:

38.36

T:

7.19

PS Ratio

ADM:

0.51

T:

1.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADM:

$80.61B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADM:

$4.70B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

ADM:

$3.48B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADM vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADM
ADM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ADM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ADM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADM Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADM vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ADMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.92

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.91

-0.46

+5.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.34

-1.03

+13.38

ADM vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADM Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADM and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ADM vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADM drawdown since its inception was -68.01%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADM and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.01%

-64.15%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.79%

-28.89%

+16.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.22%

-28.89%

-20.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.14%

-32.01%

-22.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.14%

-42.35%

-11.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.02%

-21.57%

+19.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.57%

-15.74%

-5.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.08%

12.94%

-7.86%

Volatility

ADM vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) is 6.26%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 9.59%. This indicates that ADM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.26%

9.59%

-3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.74%

19.91%

-1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.73%

23.72%

+3.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.31%

24.38%

+3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.90%

23.92%

+2.98%

Dividends

ADM vs. T - Dividend Comparison

ADM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than T's 6.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
2.40%3.55%3.96%2.49%1.72%2.19%2.86%3.02%3.27%3.19%2.63%3.05%
T
AT&T Inc.
6.58%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

ADM vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
20.49B
33.47B
(ADM) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ADM and T have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (9.59%) compared to ADM (6.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADM dropped -68.01% vs T's -64.15%.

ADM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADM and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer