ADFI vs. USL
ADFI (Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - ADFI is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Anfield, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. ADFI is actively managed, while USL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ADFI returned -0.22%/yr vs 12.73%/yr for USL. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. ADFI charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.
Performance
ADFI vs. USL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADFI achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 39.93% return.
ADFI
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 0.08%
- 1Y
- 3.42%
- 3Y*
- 3.38%
- 5Y*
- -0.22%
- 10Y*
- —
USL
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -13.39%
- YTD
- 39.93%
- 6M
- 37.90%
- 1Y
- 26.14%
- 3Y*
- 13.28%
- 5Y*
- 12.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
ADFI vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADFI Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | 0.14% | 5.61% | 0.51% | 6.70% | -11.66% | -3.38% | -0.06% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 39.93% | -12.37% | 8.30% | -1.11% | 27.10% | 62.48% | 5.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADFI and USL is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2020 | -0.08 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between ADFI and USL has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.08 to -0.35, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADFI vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank
ADFI
USL
ADFI vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (ADFI) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ADFI | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.17 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 1.50 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.88 | 3.41 | +0.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ADFI vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADFI drawdown since its inception was -17.62%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADFI and USL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADFI | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.62% | -89.06% | +71.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.48% | -17.53% | +15.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.60% | -23.33% | +17.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.11% | -33.82% | +17.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.49% | -46.93% | +43.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | -61.39% | +53.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 7.72% | -6.84% |
Volatility
ADFI vs. USL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (ADFI) is 1.13%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that ADFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADFI | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.13% | 8.21% | -7.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.88% | 24.20% | -21.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.58% | 28.90% | -24.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.20% | 30.24% | -24.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.87% | 32.33% | -26.46% |
ADFI vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ADFI has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
ADFI vs. USL - Dividend Comparison
ADFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADFI Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | 3.22% | 3.30% | 3.17% | 2.90% | 1.60% | 0.80% | 0.50% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ADFI and USL have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USL has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to ADFI (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADFI dropped -17.62% vs USL's -89.06%.
On 5-year performance, USL leads with 12.73% vs -0.22% for ADFI. On fees, USL is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, ADFI has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USL has performed better with a 12.73% return vs -0.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USL is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for ADFI.
ADFI has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.00% for USL.
ADFI is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while USL is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Anfield and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for ADFI and 0.88% for USL.
USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ADFI and USL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer