PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADFI vs. MAMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ADFI vs. MAMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (ADFI) and Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ADFI vs. MAMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ADFI
Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
-0.48%5.61%0.51%6.70%-11.66%-0.12%
MAMB
Monarch Ambassador Income ETF
1.19%10.69%1.32%4.90%-13.02%1.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADFI achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly lower than MAMB's 1.19% return.


ADFI

1D
0.41%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
-0.48%
6M
0.37%
1Y
3.10%
3Y*
3.03%
5Y*
-0.16%
10Y*

MAMB

1D
0.75%
1M
-2.44%
YTD
1.19%
6M
3.06%
1Y
8.39%
3Y*
4.79%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ADFI vs. MAMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADFI has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MAMB's 1.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ADFI vs. MAMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADFI
ADFI Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
ADFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADFI Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ADFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADFI Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

MAMB
MAMB Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MAMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
MAMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAMB Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADFI vs. MAMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (ADFI) and Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADFIMAMBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.56

1.38

-0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.81

1.95

-1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.25

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

2.43

-1.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.70

7.82

-4.12

ADFI vs. MAMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADFI Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the MAMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADFI and MAMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADFIMAMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

1.38

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.13

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.14

-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between ADFI and MAMB is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ADFI vs. MAMB - Dividend Comparison

ADFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than MAMB's 2.46% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
ADFI
Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
3.25%3.30%3.17%2.90%1.60%0.80%0.50%
MAMB
Monarch Ambassador Income ETF
2.46%2.47%2.11%1.73%0.92%0.56%0.00%

Drawdowns

ADFI vs. MAMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADFI drawdown since its inception was -17.62%, smaller than the maximum MAMB drawdown of -19.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADFI and MAMB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ADFIMAMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.62%

-19.33%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.69%

-3.55%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.11%

-19.33%

+3.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.09%

-2.44%

-1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

-7.70%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

1.10%

-0.25%

Volatility

ADFI vs. MAMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (ADFI) is 1.58%, while Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB) has a volatility of 2.34%. This indicates that ADFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ADFIMAMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.58%

2.34%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.96%

4.29%

-1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.60%

6.09%

-0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.18%

6.97%

-0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.94%

6.96%

-1.02%