PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADFI vs. BCPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ADFI vs. BCPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (ADFI) and BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ADFI

1D
0.06%
1M
0.43%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
0.01%
1Y
4.05%
3Y*
3.32%
5Y*
-0.16%
10Y*

BCPL

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.38%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADFI vs. BCPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ADFI and BCPL is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADFI vs. BCPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADFI
ADFI Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
ADFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADFI Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
ADFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADFI Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

BCPL
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADFI vs. BCPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (ADFI) and BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADFIBCPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.74

ADFI vs. BCPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADFIBCPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.36

-0.45

Drawdowns

ADFI vs. BCPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADFI drawdown since its inception was -17.62%, which is greater than BCPL's maximum drawdown of -2.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADFI and BCPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADFIBCPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.62%

-2.95%

-14.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.64%

-1.12%

-2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.61%

-1.05%

-6.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

Volatility

ADFI vs. BCPL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADFIBCPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.77%

4.04%

+0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.19%

4.04%

+2.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.88%

4.04%

+1.84%

ADFI vs. BCPL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADFI has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BCPL's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

ADFI vs. BCPL - Dividend Comparison

ADFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than BCPL's 1.57% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ADFI
Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
3.24%3.30%3.17%2.90%1.60%0.80%0.50%
BCPL
BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF
1.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ADFI and BCPL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BCPL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BCPL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for ADFI.

ADFI has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 1.57% for BCPL.

They also come from different issuers: Anfield and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for ADFI and 0.40% for BCPL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADFI and BCPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer