ADFI vs. AEMS
ADFI (Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF) and AEMS (Anfield Enhanced Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ADFI is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Anfield, while AEMS is a Derivative Income fund managed by Anfield. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ADFI charges 1.75%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for AEMS.
Performance
ADFI vs. AEMS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADFI achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than AEMS's 15.80% return.
ADFI
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- 3.58%
- 3Y*
- 3.42%
- 5Y*
- -0.12%
- 10Y*
- —
AEMS
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 5.79%
- YTD
- 15.80%
- 6M
- 16.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ADFI vs. AEMS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ADFI Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | 0.16% | 2.49% |
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF | 15.80% | 11.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADFI and AEMS is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADFI vs. AEMS — Risk / Return Rank
ADFI
AEMS
ADFI vs. AEMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (ADFI) and Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ADFI | AEMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.19 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ADFI | AEMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 2.00 | -2.10 |
Drawdowns
ADFI vs. AEMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADFI drawdown since its inception was -17.62%, which is greater than AEMS's maximum drawdown of -11.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADFI and AEMS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADFI | AEMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.62% | -11.37% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.47% | -0.17% | -3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.60% | -1.48% | -6.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | — | — |
Volatility
ADFI vs. AEMS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADFI | AEMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.76% | 16.11% | -11.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.19% | 16.11% | -9.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.88% | 16.11% | -10.23% |
ADFI vs. AEMS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ADFI has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AEMS's 1.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
ADFI vs. AEMS - Dividend Comparison
ADFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, less than AEMS's 6.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADFI Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | 3.24% | 3.30% | 3.17% | 2.90% | 1.60% | 0.80% | 0.50% |
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF | 6.51% | 7.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ADFI and AEMS have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AEMS is cheaper at 1.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AEMS is cheaper with a 1.21% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for ADFI.
AEMS has the higher dividend yield at 6.51%, compared with 3.24% for ADFI.
ADFI is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while AEMS is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for ADFI and 1.21% for AEMS.
Find the right allocation for ADFI and AEMS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer