ADDS vs. MFUS
ADDS (Hedgeye Index Adds ETF) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ADDS is a Multi-factor fund actively managed by Hedgeye, while MFUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. ADDS is actively managed, while MFUS is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ADDS charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.
Performance
ADDS vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ADDS
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFUS
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- 6M
- 13.96%
- YTD
- 16.65%
- 1Y
- 23.96%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 13.31%
- 10Y*
- —
ADDS vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ADDS Hedgeye Index Adds ETF | 3.38% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADDS and MFUS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADDS vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank
ADDS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MFUS
ADDS vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Index Adds ETF (ADDS) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ADDS | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ADDS vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADDS drawdown since its inception was -10.64%, smaller than the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADDS and MFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADDS | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.64% | -35.21% | +24.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.36% | -2.11% | -4.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.07% | -3.96% | -0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.58% | — |
Volatility
ADDS vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADDS | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.98% | 11.33% | +35.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.98% | 15.10% | +31.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.98% | 17.33% | +29.65% |
ADDS vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ADDS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ADDS vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison
ADDS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADDS Hedgeye Index Adds ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.37% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ADDS and MFUS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ADDS.
MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.00% for ADDS.
ADDS is categorized as Multi-factor, while MFUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ADDS and 0.30% for MFUS.
Find the right allocation for ADDS and MFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer