ADDS vs. MFEM

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

ADDS (Hedgeye Index Adds ETF) and MFEM (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ADDS is a Multi-factor fund actively managed by Hedgeye, while MFEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Market Index. ADDS is actively managed, while MFEM is passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ADDS charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MFEM.

Performance

ADDS vs. MFEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hedgeye Index Adds ETF (ADDS) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ADDS

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: 0.64%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MFEM

• 1D: -2.91%
• 1M: -2.64%
• 6M: 14.37%
• YTD: 18.73%
• 1Y: 31.60%
• 3Y*: 18.67%
• 5Y*: 7.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADDS vs. MFEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ADDS Hedgeye Index Adds ETF	3.38%
MFEM PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF	-7.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ADDS and MFEM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.76

Return for Risk

ADDS vs. MFEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADDS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MFEM

MFEM Risk / Return Rank: 52
MFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
MFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
MFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 53
MFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
MFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADDS vs. MFEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Index Adds ETF (ADDS) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ADDS	MFEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.46	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.98	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.28	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.47	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.68	—

Drawdowns

ADDS vs. MFEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADDS drawdown since its inception was -10.64%, smaller than the maximum MFEM drawdown of -43.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADDS and MFEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ADDS	MFEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.64%	-43.32%	+32.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.86%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.22%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.36%	-10.73%	+4.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.07%	-11.44%	+7.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.12%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ADDS	MFEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.10%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	20.15%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.98%	21.80%	+25.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.98%	17.27%	+29.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.98%	19.65%	+27.33%

ADDS vs. MFEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADDS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than MFEM's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

ADDS vs. MFEM - Dividend Comparison

ADDS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ADDS Hedgeye Index Adds ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MFEM PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF	2.32%	2.77%	5.89%	4.01%	7.01%	29.96%	1.70%	2.37%	1.18%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ADDS and MFEM in my portfolio?

ADDS and MFEM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ADDS or MFEM?

On fees, MFEM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ADDS or MFEM?

MFEM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ADDS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ADDS or MFEM?

MFEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 0.00% for ADDS.

What is the main difference between ADDS and MFEM?

ADDS is categorized as Multi-factor, while MFEM is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ADDS and 0.49% for MFEM.