ADC vs. QQQI
ADC (Agree Realty Corporation) is a stock, while QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Over the past year, ADC returned 0.57% vs 30.41% for QQQI. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
ADC vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADC achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 13.43% return.
ADC
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- -1.21%
- 1Y
- 0.57%
- 3Y*
- 8.22%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
QQQI
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 6.91%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 12.92%
- 1Y
- 30.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ADC vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ADC Agree Realty Corporation | 1.77% | 6.62% | 22.66% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.43% | 18.62% | 19.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADC and QQQI is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADC vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
ADC
QQQI
ADC vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ADC | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.43 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.05 | 3.18 | -3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.13 | 14.27 | -14.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ADC | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 | 2.35 | -2.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 1.34 | -0.96 |
Drawdowns
ADC vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADC drawdown since its inception was -70.25%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADC and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADC | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.25% | -20.00% | -50.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.14% | -9.61% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.14% | -0.17% | -10.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.64% | -2.20% | -7.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.37% | 2.14% | +2.23% |
Volatility
ADC vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 2.68%. This indicates that ADC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADC | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 2.68% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.04% | 9.85% | +2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.92% | 12.98% | +2.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 17.07% | +1.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.64% | 17.07% | +6.57% |
Dividends
ADC vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
ADC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, less than QQQI's 13.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADC Agree Realty Corporation | 4.35% | 4.28% | 4.26% | 4.64% | 3.95% | 3.65% | 3.61% | 3.25% | 3.65% | 3.94% | 4.17% | 5.43% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.19% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ADC and QQQI have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ADC has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to QQQI (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADC dropped -70.25% vs QQQI's -20.00%.
QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ADC and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer