PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADBG vs. HOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ADBG vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADBG achieves a -54.70% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -61.32% return.


ADBG

1D
-5.32%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
-54.70%
6M
-54.25%
1Y
-71.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOOG

1D
-13.39%
1M
1.99%
YTD
-61.32%
6M
-72.58%
1Y
-32.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADBG vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ADBG and HOOG is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADBG vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADBG
ADBG Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
ADBG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADBG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADBG Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
ADBG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADBG Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADBG vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADBGHOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.07

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

-0.38

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.42

-0.61

-0.81

ADBG vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADBG Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the HOOG Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADBG and HOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADBGHOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.07

-0.24

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.93

0.28

-1.21

Drawdowns

ADBG vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADBG drawdown since its inception was -76.71%, smaller than the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADBG and HOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADBGHOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.71%

-86.94%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.23%

-86.94%

+10.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-72.49%

-81.96%

+9.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.84%

-37.85%

-3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

50.52%

53.71%

-3.19%

Volatility

ADBG vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG) is 27.94%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a volatility of 45.54%. This indicates that ADBG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADBGHOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.94%

45.54%

-17.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.40%

101.44%

-45.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.29%

137.92%

-70.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.90%

145.39%

-78.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.90%

145.39%

-78.49%

ADBG vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ADBG and HOOG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

ADBG vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

ADBG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.81%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ADBG and HOOG have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOG has higher volatility (45.54%) compared to ADBG (27.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADBG dropped -76.71% vs HOOG's -86.94%.

On 1-year performance, HOOG leads with -32.55% vs -71.70% for ADBG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, ADBG has been the lower-risk option at 27.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HOOG has performed better with a -32.55% return vs -71.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ADBG and HOOG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 31.81%, compared with 0.00% for ADBG.

HOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADBG and HOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer