ADBE vs. CL
ADBE (Adobe Inc) and CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) are both stocks. ADBE operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while CL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, ADBE returned 8.00%/yr vs 4.84%/yr for CL. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ADBE vs. CL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADBE achieves a -41.04% return, which is significantly lower than CL's 16.05% return. Over the past 10 years, ADBE has outperformed CL with an annualized return of 8.00%, while CL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.84% annualized return.
ADBE
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -16.66%
- YTD
- -41.04%
- 6M
- -41.23%
- 1Y
- -47.31%
- 3Y*
- -25.31%
- 5Y*
- -17.60%
- 10Y*
- 8.00%
CL
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 16.05%
- 6M
- 15.45%
- 1Y
- 2.89%
- 3Y*
- 7.73%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- 4.84%
ADBE vs. CL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADBE Adobe Inc | -41.04% | -21.29% | -25.46% | 77.28% | -40.65% | 13.38% | 51.64% | 45.78% | 29.10% | 70.22% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 16.05% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADBE and CL is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 1986 | 0.21 |
The correlation between ADBE and CL shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (3 years) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ADBE:
$82.96B
CL:
$72.93B
ADBE:
$17.42
CL:
$2.58
ADBE:
11.85
CL:
35.12
ADBE:
0.83
CL:
9.07
ADBE:
3.40
CL:
3.52
ADBE:
7.20
CL:
502.94
ADBE:
$25.20B
CL:
$20.80B
ADBE:
$22.46B
CL:
$12.49B
ADBE:
$9.68B
CL:
$3.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADBE vs. CL — Risk / Return Rank
ADBE
CL
ADBE vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adobe Inc (ADBE) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ADBE | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.04 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 0.16 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.84 | 0.26 | -2.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ADBE vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADBE drawdown since its inception was -79.89%, which is greater than CL's maximum drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADBE and CL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADBE | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.89% | -58.91% | -20.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.21% | -18.64% | -30.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.86% | -29.05% | -38.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.36% | -29.05% | -41.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.36% | -29.05% | -41.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.02% | -13.22% | -56.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.00% | -11.24% | -14.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.68% | 11.33% | +14.35% |
Volatility
ADBE vs. CL - Volatility Comparison
Adobe Inc (ADBE) has a higher volatility of 16.70% compared to Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) at 8.34%. This indicates that ADBE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADBE | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.70% | 8.34% | +8.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.10% | 17.30% | +11.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.80% | 21.65% | +13.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.53% | 18.82% | +17.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.50% | 19.76% | +14.74% |
Dividends
ADBE vs. CL - Dividend Comparison
ADBE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADBE Adobe Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.31% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
Financials
ADBE vs. CL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Adobe Inc and Colgate-Palmolive Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ADBE vs. CL - Profitability Comparison
ADBE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adobe Inc reported a gross profit of 5.90B and revenue of 6.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.2%.
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.23B and revenue of 5.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
ADBE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adobe Inc reported an operating income of 2.24B and revenue of 6.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.8%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
ADBE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adobe Inc reported a net income of 1.71B and revenue of 6.62B, resulting in a net margin of 25.9%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 646.00M and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ADBE and CL have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ADBE has higher volatility (16.70%) compared to CL (8.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADBE dropped -79.89% vs CL's -58.91%.
CL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ADBE and CL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer