PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADAM vs. MFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ADAM vs. MFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adamas Trust, Inc (ADAM) and MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADAM achieves a 72.44% return, which is significantly higher than MFA's 6.33% return. Over the past 10 years, ADAM has outperformed MFA with an annualized return of 4.54%, while MFA has yielded a comparatively lower 1.15% annualized return.


ADAM

1D
1.11%
1M
37.10%
YTD
72.44%
6M
73.87%
1Y
105.72%
3Y*
19.86%
5Y*
4.23%
10Y*
4.54%

MFA

1D
1.60%
1M
0.21%
YTD
6.33%
6M
5.69%
1Y
17.48%
3Y*
7.67%
5Y*
0.22%
10Y*
1.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADAM vs. MFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADAM
Adamas Trust, Inc
72.44%36.49%-19.27%-5.45%-20.80%10.70%-36.23%20.32%8.95%6.02%
MFA
MFA Financial, Inc.
6.33%6.07%2.63%30.66%-37.20%27.71%-40.87%27.54%-5.85%14.30%

Correlation

The correlation between ADAM and MFA is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2004

0.46

Over the past year, ADAM and MFA have become more correlated (0.72) than their long-term average of 0.46, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

ADAM:

$1.70

MFA:

$1.70

PE Ratio

ADAM:

5.37

MFA:

5.60

PS Ratio

ADAM:

1.17

MFA:

2.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADAM:

$713.66M

MFA:

$343.42M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADAM:

$546.72M

MFA:

$413.35M

EBITDA (TTM)

ADAM:

$477.31M

MFA:

$341.51M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADAM vs. MFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADAM
ADAM Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ADAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADAM Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ADAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADAM Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

MFA
MFA Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFA Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADAM vs. MFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adamas Trust, Inc (ADAM) and MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ADAMMFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.15

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.23

1.44

+4.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.77

3.15

+16.62

ADAM vs. MFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADAM Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the MFA Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADAM and MFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ADAM vs. MFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADAM drawdown since its inception was -97.94%, roughly equal to the maximum MFA drawdown of -95.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADAM and MFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADAMMFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.94%

-95.52%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.07%

-12.22%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.20%

-31.62%

-10.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.26%

-56.54%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.01%

-95.52%

+11.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.82%

-31.67%

-28.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.65%

-21.55%

-52.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.37%

5.56%

-0.19%

Volatility

ADAM vs. MFA - Volatility Comparison

Adamas Trust, Inc (ADAM) has a higher volatility of 29.43% compared to MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) at 6.62%. This indicates that ADAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADAMMFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.43%

6.62%

+22.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.88%

17.24%

+20.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.89%

22.64%

+23.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.69%

31.59%

+6.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.40%

84.77%

-35.37%

Dividends

ADAM vs. MFA - Dividend Comparison

ADAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.33%, more than MFA's 15.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADAM
Adamas Trust, Inc
35.33%11.78%13.20%14.07%15.62%10.75%6.10%12.84%13.58%12.97%14.55%19.14%
MFA
MFA Financial, Inc.
15.11%15.47%13.74%12.42%16.95%8.44%8.35%10.46%11.98%10.10%10.48%12.12%

Financials

ADAM vs. MFA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Adamas Trust, Inc and MFA Financial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
229.24M
0
(ADAM) Total Revenue
(MFA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ADAM and MFA have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADAM has higher volatility (29.43%) compared to MFA (6.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADAM dropped -97.94% vs MFA's -95.52%.

ADAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADAM and MFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer