PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADAM vs. EFC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ADAM vs. EFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adamas Trust, Inc (ADAM) and Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADAM achieves a 24.36% return, which is significantly higher than EFC's 3.50% return. Over the past 10 years, ADAM has underperformed EFC with an annualized return of 2.03%, while EFC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.08% annualized return.


ADAM

1D
-2.87%
1M
1.03%
YTD
24.36%
6M
23.09%
1Y
52.21%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
-2.20%
10Y*
2.03%

EFC

1D
-1.76%
1M
3.68%
YTD
3.50%
6M
3.72%
1Y
20.29%
3Y*
14.78%
5Y*
5.51%
10Y*
9.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADAM vs. EFC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADAM
Adamas Trust, Inc
24.36%36.49%-19.27%-5.45%-20.80%10.70%-36.23%20.32%8.95%6.02%
EFC
Ellington Financial Inc.
3.50%26.13%8.68%18.16%-18.32%26.33%-10.16%32.43%17.29%4.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ADAM and EFC is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2010

0.55

The correlation between ADAM and EFC shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ADAM:

$809.21M

EFC:

$1.63B

EPS

ADAM:

$1.70

EFC:

$1.95

PE Ratio

ADAM:

5.17

EFC:

6.87

PS Ratio

ADAM:

1.13

EFC:

3.35

PB Ratio

ADAM:

0.88

EFC:

0.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADAM:

$713.66M

EFC:

$417.93M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADAM:

$546.72M

EFC:

$347.01M

EBITDA (TTM)

ADAM:

$477.31M

EFC:

$270.77M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADAM vs. EFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADAM
ADAM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ADAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADAM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ADAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADAM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

EFC
EFC Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
EFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADAM vs. EFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adamas Trust, Inc (ADAM) and Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADAMEFCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.21

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

1.15

+1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.71

3.74

+5.97

ADAM vs. EFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the EFC Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADAM and EFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADAMEFCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.16

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

0.23

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

0.22

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.26

-0.35

Drawdowns

ADAM vs. EFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADAM drawdown since its inception was -97.94%, which is greater than EFC's maximum drawdown of -79.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADAM and EFC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADAMEFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.94%

-79.08%

-18.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.07%

-17.71%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.20%

-18.86%

-23.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.24%

-34.19%

-24.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.01%

-79.08%

-4.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.02%

-1.76%

-69.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.68%

-9.95%

-63.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.39%

5.43%

-0.04%

Volatility

ADAM vs. EFC - Volatility Comparison

Adamas Trust, Inc (ADAM) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) at 4.98%. This indicates that ADAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADAMEFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.30%

4.98%

+2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.28%

13.05%

+12.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.76%

17.62%

+14.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.62%

23.96%

+10.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.27%

42.26%

+6.01%

Dividends

ADAM vs. EFC - Dividend Comparison

ADAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.13%, less than EFC's 11.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADAM
Adamas Trust, Inc
10.13%11.78%13.20%14.07%15.62%10.75%6.10%12.84%13.58%12.97%14.55%19.14%
EFC
Ellington Financial Inc.
11.68%11.49%13.20%14.16%14.55%9.60%8.49%9.87%10.70%12.13%12.56%14.60%

Financials

ADAM vs. EFC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Adamas Trust, Inc and Ellington Financial Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
229.24M
61.25M
(ADAM) Total Revenue
(EFC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ADAM and EFC have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADAM has higher volatility (7.30%) compared to EFC (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADAM dropped -97.94% vs EFC's -79.08%.

ADAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADAM and EFC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer