ACYS vs. XYLD
ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. ACYS is actively managed, while XYLD is passively managed. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ACYS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.
Performance
ACYS vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ACYS
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
XYLD
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 7.06%
- 1Y
- 16.68%
- 3Y*
- 11.20%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.48M | $7.66M | $5.85M | |
| $38.30M | $37.42M | $31.92M |
ACYS vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 1.95% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 4.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACYS and XYLD is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACYS vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank
ACYS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XYLD
ACYS vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACYS | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.54 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.17 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.47 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACYS vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACYS drawdown since its inception was -0.78%, smaller than the maximum XYLD drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACYS and XYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACYS | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.78% | -33.46% | +32.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -0.44% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -3.68% | +3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.02% | — |
Volatility
ACYS vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACYS | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 7.00% | -3.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 11.25% | -7.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 14.15% | -10.45% |
ACYS vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACYS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACYS vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison
ACYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than XYLD's 10.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.63% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACYS and XYLD have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACYS.
XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.63%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACYS and 0.60% for XYLD.
Find the right allocation for ACYS and XYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer