ACYN vs. AMDW

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

ACYN (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ACYN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.

Performance

ACYN vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF (ACYN) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ACYN

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.16%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

AMDW

• 1D: -9.24%
• 1M: -15.34%
• 6M: 173.56%
• YTD: 150.15%
• 1Y: 206.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 228.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ACYN FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF	$37.10M	$36.67M	$33.81M
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	$10.57M	$9.37M	$8.65M

ACYN vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ACYN FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF	6.38%
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	153.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ACYN and AMDW is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026	0.33

Return for Risk

ACYN vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ACYN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMDW

AMDW Risk / Return Rank: 85
AMDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
AMDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
AMDW Omega Ratio Rank: 77
AMDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
AMDW Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ACYN vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF (ACYN) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACYN	AMDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.40	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.93	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.36	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	6.01	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.75	—

Drawdowns

ACYN vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACYN drawdown since its inception was -1.88%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACYN and AMDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACYN	AMDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.88%	-34.64%	+32.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-20.31%	+20.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.28%	-14.01%	+13.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	17.69%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACYN	AMDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	29.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	68.16%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.09%	86.61%	-80.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.09%	85.60%	-79.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.09%	85.60%	-79.51%

ACYN vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACYN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACYN vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

ACYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than AMDW's 54.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ACYN FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF	3.54%	0.00%
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	54.97%	34.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACYN and AMDW in my portfolio?

ACYN and AMDW have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACYN or AMDW?

On fees, ACYN is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACYN or AMDW?

ACYN is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACYN or AMDW?

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 54.97%, compared with 3.54% for ACYN.

What is the main difference between ACYN and AMDW?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACYN and 0.99% for AMDW.