ACYN vs. IVVW

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

ACYN (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF) and IVVW (iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. ACYN is actively managed, while IVVW is passively managed. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ACYN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IVVW.

Performance

ACYN vs. IVVW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF (ACYN) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ACYN

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.16%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

IVVW

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 2.63%
• 6M: 8.82%
• YTD: 9.23%
• 1Y: 20.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ACYN FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF	$37.10M	$36.67M	$33.81M
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	$1.98M	$2.03M	$2.63M

ACYN vs. IVVW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ACYN FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF	6.38%
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	7.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ACYN and IVVW is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026	0.49

Return for Risk

ACYN vs. IVVW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ACYN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IVVW

IVVW Risk / Return Rank: 89
IVVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
IVVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
IVVW Omega Ratio Rank: 92
IVVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
IVVW Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ACYN vs. IVVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF (ACYN) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACYN	IVVW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.36	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.24	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.49	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.46	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	17.95	—

Drawdowns

ACYN vs. IVVW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACYN drawdown since its inception was -1.88%, smaller than the maximum IVVW drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACYN and IVVW.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACYN	IVVW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.88%	-16.79%	+14.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	0.00%	-0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.28%	-1.67%	+1.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.12%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACYN	IVVW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.32%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.09%	8.53%	-2.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.09%	12.55%	-6.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.09%	12.55%	-6.46%

ACYN vs. IVVW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACYN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVW's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACYN vs. IVVW - Dividend Comparison

ACYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than IVVW's 18.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ACYN FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Income ETF	3.54%	0.00%	0.00%
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	18.34%	18.55%	13.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACYN and IVVW in my portfolio?

ACYN and IVVW have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACYN or IVVW?

On fees, IVVW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACYN or IVVW?

IVVW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACYN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACYN or IVVW?

IVVW has the higher dividend yield at 18.34%, compared with 3.54% for ACYN.

What is the main difference between ACYN and IVVW?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACYN and 0.25% for IVVW.