ACWV vs. DFND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - ACWV tracks the MSCI AC World Minimum Volatility (USD) while DFND tracks the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWV returned 7.36%/yr vs 7.16%/yr for DFND. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACWV charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.

Performance

ACWV vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ACWV having a 7.36% annualized return and DFND not far behind at 7.16%.

ACWV

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 1.01%
• YTD: 2.36%
• 6M: 2.56%
• 1Y: 4.79%
• 3Y*: 10.06%
• 5Y*: 5.47%
• 10Y*: 7.36%

DFND

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: -1.09%
• 1Y: 0.20%
• 3Y*: 7.91%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 7.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWV vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	2.36%	11.04%	11.38%	8.23%	-10.36%	13.97%	3.04%	21.04%	-1.42%	18.57%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.00%	10.37%	8.48%	12.13%	-19.59%	14.80%	16.12%	19.53%	-1.83%	16.33%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWV and DFND is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2016	0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between ACWV and DFND has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ACWV vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ACWV	DFND
Technology	22.6%	24.8%
Healthcare	13.2%	10.7%
Financial Services	13.1%	18.2%
Communication Services	12.2%	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	10.3%	4.2%
Industrials	7.9%	17.1%
Utilities	7.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.1%	3.5%
Energy	3.4%	1.7%
Basic Materials	1.8%	4.3%
Real Estate	0.8%	2.0%

Return for Risk

ACWV vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWV

ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 18
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 17
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 20

DFND

DFND Risk / Return Rank: 9
DFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Omega Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWV vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACWV	DFND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	0.02	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	0.11	+0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.02	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.76	0.07	+0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.37	0.13	+2.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACWV vs. DFND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWV Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is higher than the DFND Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWV and DFND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACWV	DFND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62	0.02	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.21	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.38	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.36	+0.35

Drawdowns

ACWV vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWV drawdown since its inception was -28.82%, which is greater than DFND's maximum drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWV and DFND.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACWV	DFND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.82%	-22.65%	-6.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.37%	-3.44%	-2.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.56%	-12.56%	+5.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.14%	-22.65%	+4.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.82%	-22.65%	-6.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.92%	-3.69%	+0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.11%	-5.70%	+2.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	3.70%	-1.67%

Volatility

ACWV vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) has a higher volatility of 1.79% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that ACWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACWV	DFND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.79%	0.00%	+1.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.54%	6.16%	-0.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.71%	10.92%	-3.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.23%	22.46%	-12.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.30%	19.09%	-6.79%

ACWV vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACWV vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

ACWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than DFND's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	2.04%	2.09%	2.33%	2.41%	2.18%	1.92%	1.77%	2.54%	2.32%	2.04%	2.56%	2.28%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.62%	1.10%	1.64%	1.84%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.53%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACWV and DFND in my portfolio?

ACWV and DFND have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACWV or DFND?

ACWV has higher volatility (1.79%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWV dropped -28.82% vs DFND's -22.65%.

Which ETF is better, ACWV or DFND?

On 10-year performance, ACWV leads with 7.36% vs 7.16% for DFND. On fees, ACWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ACWV or DFND?

Over the 10-year period, ACWV has performed better with a 7.36% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACWV or DFND?

ACWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACWV or DFND?

ACWV has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.

What is the main difference between ACWV and DFND?

ACWV tracks MSCI AC World Minimum Volatility (USD), while DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ACWV and 1.50% for DFND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.