ACWI vs. POW

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. ACWI is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACWI charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

ACWI vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWI achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 35.68% return.

ACWI

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: -0.62%
• 6M: 8.53%
• YTD: 11.23%
• 1Y: 22.75%
• 3Y*: 18.82%
• 5Y*: 11.06%
• 10Y*: 12.50%

POW

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: -13.79%
• 6M: 25.01%
• YTD: 35.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWI vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	11.23%	0.28%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	35.68%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWI and POW is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

ACWI vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWI

ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 63
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 62
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 69

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWI vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACWI	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.02	—	—

Drawdowns

ACWI vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWI drawdown since its inception was -56.00%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWI and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACWI	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.00%	-20.28%	-35.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.62%	-20.28%	+18.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.57%	-4.56%	-4.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACWI	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.85%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.53%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.72%	33.06%	-19.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.21%	33.06%	-16.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.04%	33.06%	-16.02%

ACWI vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWI has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACWI vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	1.44%	1.55%	1.70%	1.88%	1.79%	1.71%	1.43%	2.33%	2.18%	1.94%	2.19%	2.56%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACWI and POW in my portfolio?

ACWI and POW have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACWI or POW?

On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACWI or POW?

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACWI or POW?

ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between ACWI and POW?

ACWI is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWI and 0.75% for POW.