ACWI vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. ACWI is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, ACWI returned 22.75% vs 299.04% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.46, they often move in opposite directions. ACWI charges 0.32%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

ACWI vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWI achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -27.52% return.

ACWI

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: -0.62%
• 6M: 8.53%
• YTD: 11.23%
• 1Y: 22.75%
• 3Y*: 18.82%
• 5Y*: 11.06%
• 10Y*: 12.50%

MSTZ

• 1D: 6.51%
• 1M: 38.88%
• 6M: -2.59%
• YTD: -27.52%
• 1Y: 299.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWI vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	11.23%	22.41%	1.75%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-27.52%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWI and MSTZ is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.46

Return for Risk

ACWI vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWI

ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 63
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 62
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 69

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 70
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWI vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACWI	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	2.03	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	2.49	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.33	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	3.55	-1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.02	6.84	+3.18

ACWI vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWI Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWI and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACWI vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWI drawdown since its inception was -56.00%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWI and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACWI	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.00%	-99.38%	+43.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.73%	-84.89%	+75.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.62%	-97.53%	+95.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.57%	-94.55%	+85.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	43.95%	-41.68%

Volatility

ACWI vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) is 3.85%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 55.03%. This indicates that ACWI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACWI	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.85%	55.03%	-51.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.53%	134.45%	-122.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.72%	148.58%	-134.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.21%	170.73%	-154.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.04%	170.73%	-153.69%

ACWI vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWI has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACWI vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	1.44%	1.55%	1.70%	1.88%	1.79%	1.71%	1.43%	2.33%	2.18%	1.94%	2.19%	2.56%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACWI and MSTZ in my portfolio?

ACWI and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACWI or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (55.03%) compared to ACWI (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWI dropped -56.00% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, ACWI or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 299.04% vs 22.75% for ACWI. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ACWI or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 299.04% return vs 22.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACWI or MSTZ?

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACWI or MSTZ?

ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between ACWI and MSTZ?

ACWI is categorized as Global Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWI and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.