ACWI vs. MCHI

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) and MCHI (iShares MSCI China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index, while MCHI is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWI returned 13.02%/yr vs 4.76%/yr for MCHI. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACWI charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MCHI.

Performance

ACWI vs. MCHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWI achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly higher than MCHI's -8.72% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWI has outperformed MCHI with an annualized return of 13.02%, while MCHI has yielded a comparatively lower 4.76% annualized return.

ACWI

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -0.11%
• YTD: 10.59%
• 6M: 11.34%
• 1Y: 26.86%
• 3Y*: 19.78%
• 5Y*: 10.88%
• 10Y*: 13.02%

MCHI

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -5.63%
• YTD: -8.72%
• 6M: -9.79%
• 1Y: 2.33%
• 3Y*: 8.42%
• 5Y*: -5.82%
• 10Y*: 4.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWI vs. MCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	10.59%	22.41%	17.45%	22.27%	-18.39%	18.66%	16.34%	26.59%	-9.19%	24.33%
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF	-8.72%	31.04%	17.73%	-11.94%	-23.01%	-21.74%	27.78%	23.72%	-19.79%	54.67%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWI and MCHI is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011	0.66

The correlation between ACWI and MCHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (3 years) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ACWI vs. MCHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ACWI	MCHI
Technology	29.4%	9.6%
Financial Services	16.1%	19.1%
Industrials	10.9%	5.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	26.4%
Communication Services	9.0%	18.8%
Healthcare	8.1%	5.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	3.2%
Energy	4.2%	3.7%
Basic Materials	3.7%	5.5%
Utilities	2.6%	1.7%
Real Estate	1.8%	1.5%

Return for Risk

ACWI vs. MCHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWI

ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 67
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 71

MCHI

MCHI Risk / Return Rank: 10
MCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
MCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
MCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 10
MCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
MCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWI vs. MCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACWI	MCHI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	0.02	+1.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	0.18	+2.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.02	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	0.03	+2.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.46	0.05	+11.41

ACWI vs. MCHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWI Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the MCHI Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWI and MCHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACWI vs. MCHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWI drawdown since its inception was -56.00%, smaller than the maximum MCHI drawdown of -62.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWI and MCHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACWI	MCHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.00%	-62.95%	+6.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.73%	-18.51%	+8.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.55%	-25.85%	+9.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.42%	-56.98%	+30.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.53%	-62.95%	+29.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.19%	-37.76%	+35.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.60%	-24.54%	+15.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	8.81%	-6.59%

Volatility

ACWI vs. MCHI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) is 5.17%, while iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that ACWI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACWI	MCHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.17%	6.46%	-1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.09%	14.62%	-3.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.42%	20.23%	-6.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.15%	30.72%	-14.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.14%	27.38%	-10.24%

ACWI vs. MCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWI has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than MCHI's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACWI vs. MCHI - Dividend Comparison

ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than MCHI's 2.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	1.40%	1.55%	1.70%	1.88%	1.79%	1.71%	1.43%	2.33%	2.18%	1.94%	2.19%	2.56%
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF	2.32%	2.12%	2.31%	2.66%	1.78%	1.04%	1.04%	1.45%	1.60%	1.56%	1.66%	2.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACWI and MCHI in my portfolio?

ACWI and MCHI have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACWI or MCHI?

MCHI has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to ACWI (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWI dropped -56.00% vs MCHI's -62.95%.

Which ETF is better, ACWI or MCHI?

On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 13.02% vs 4.76% for MCHI. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ACWI or MCHI?

Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 13.02% return vs 4.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACWI or MCHI?

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MCHI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACWI or MCHI?

MCHI has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 1.40% for ACWI.

What is the main difference between ACWI and MCHI?

ACWI is categorized as Global Equities, while MCHI is China Equities. ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index, while MCHI tracks MSCI China Index. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWI and 0.59% for MCHI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.