PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACVF vs. SPXM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACVF vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ACVF

1D
0.48%
1M
6.31%
YTD
11.18%
6M
12.23%
1Y
21.98%
3Y*
19.83%
5Y*
12.66%
10Y*

SPXM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACVF vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ACVF
American Conservative Values ETF
11.18%4.35%
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.00%9.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ACVF and SPXM is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.51

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACVF vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACVF
ACVF Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ACVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACVF Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ACVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACVF Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXM
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACVF vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACVFSPXMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.75

ACVF vs. SPXM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACVFSPXMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

1.57

-0.54

Drawdowns

ACVF vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACVF drawdown since its inception was -24.39%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACVF and SPXM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACVFSPXMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.39%

-5.08%

-19.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.75%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-0.79%

-3.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

Volatility

ACVF vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACVFSPXMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.39%

8.21%

+3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.23%

8.21%

+8.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.97%

8.21%

+7.76%

ACVF vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACVF vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison

ACVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, more than SPXM's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ACVF
American Conservative Values ETF
0.53%0.59%0.59%0.82%0.93%0.61%0.23%
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.24%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACVF and SPXM have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACVF.

ACVF has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.

They also come from different issuers: Ridgeline Research LLC and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACVF and 0.47% for SPXM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACVF and SPXM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer