ACUG.DE vs. PUST.PA
ACUG.DE (Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D)) and PUST.PA (Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - ACUG.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Filtered PAB, while PUST.PA is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ACUG.DE returned 14.29%/yr vs 23.96%/yr for PUST.PA. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACUG.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for PUST.PA.
Performance
ACUG.DE vs. PUST.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACUG.DE achieves a 20.29% return, which is significantly higher than PUST.PA's 19.22% return.
ACUG.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- YTD
- 20.29%
- 6M
- 21.36%
- 1Y
- 32.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PUST.PA
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 19.22%
- 6M
- 18.71%
- 1Y
- 34.89%
- 3Y*
- 23.96%
- 5Y*
- 16.76%
- 10Y*
- 21.56%
ACUG.DE vs. PUST.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACUG.DE Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) | 20.29% | 13.06% | 11.24% | -2.80% | -11.79% | -4.66% |
PUST.PA Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc | 19.22% | 5.71% | 35.33% | 50.06% | -29.76% | 2.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACUG.DE and PUST.PA is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021 | 0.55 |
The correlation between ACUG.DE and PUST.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACUG.DE vs. PUST.PA — Risk / Return Rank
ACUG.DE
PUST.PA
ACUG.DE vs. PUST.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) (ACUG.DE) and Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACUG.DE | PUST.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.37 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 3.41 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.01 | 9.85 | +1.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACUG.DE vs. PUST.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACUG.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.17%, smaller than the maximum PUST.PA drawdown of -31.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACUG.DE and PUST.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACUG.DE | PUST.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.17% | -31.40% | +5.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.53% | -10.09% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.01% | -26.80% | +5.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.02% | -2.65% | -1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.44% | -5.84% | -6.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 3.51% | -0.51% |
Volatility
ACUG.DE vs. PUST.PA - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) (ACUG.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) at 6.06%. This indicates that ACUG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUST.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACUG.DE | PUST.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 6.06% | +1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.70% | 11.93% | +2.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.62% | 16.43% | +1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 19.93% | -2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 19.76% | -2.72% |
ACUG.DE vs. PUST.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACUG.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PUST.PA's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACUG.DE vs. PUST.PA - Dividend Comparison
ACUG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, while PUST.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACUG.DE Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) | 1.61% | 1.93% | 2.11% | 2.26% | 2.28% | 1.69% |
PUST.PA Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACUG.DE and PUST.PA have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACUG.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACUG.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for PUST.PA.
ACUG.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PUST.PA is Nasdaq-100. ACUG.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Filtered PAB, while PUST.PA tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ACUG.DE and 0.30% for PUST.PA.
Find the right allocation for ACUG.DE and PUST.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer