ACSV vs. AVES
ACSV (American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF) and AVES (Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACSV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while AVES is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACSV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AVES.
Performance
ACSV vs. AVES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACSV achieves a 20.43% return, which is significantly higher than AVES's 12.43% return.
ACSV
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 20.43%
- 6M
- 17.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVES
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 6M
- 12.38%
- 1Y
- 25.89%
- 3Y*
- 19.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACSV vs. AVES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACSV American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF | 20.43% | 0.92% |
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF | 12.43% | 3.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACSV and AVES is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACSV vs. AVES — Risk / Return Rank
ACSV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AVES
ACSV vs. AVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) and Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACSV | AVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACSV vs. AVES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACSV drawdown since its inception was -7.39%, smaller than the maximum AVES drawdown of -27.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSV and AVES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACSV | AVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.39% | -27.40% | +20.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.41% | +5.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -7.67% | +5.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.59% | — |
Volatility
ACSV vs. AVES - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACSV | AVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 19.01% | -2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 17.35% | -1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 17.35% | -1.14% |
ACSV vs. AVES - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACSV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AVES's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACSV vs. AVES - Dividend Comparison
ACSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than AVES's 2.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSV American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF | 0.82% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF | 2.48% | 3.17% | 4.09% | 3.96% | 3.70% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACSV and AVES have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVES is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVES is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ACSV.
AVES has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 0.82% for ACSV.
ACSV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while AVES is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ACSV and 0.36% for AVES.
Find the right allocation for ACSV and AVES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer