ACSMX vs. CMCIX
ACSMX (Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund) and CMCIX (Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past year, ACSMX returned 8.62% vs 6.56% for CMCIX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACSMX charges 1.95%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for CMCIX.
Performance
ACSMX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACSMX achieves a -4.16% return, which is significantly lower than CMCIX's 2.58% return.
ACSMX
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- -4.16%
- 6M
- -3.82%
- 1Y
- 8.62%
- 3Y*
- 10.34%
- 5Y*
- 1.13%
- 10Y*
- —
CMCIX
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 6.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACSMX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSMX Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund | -4.16% | 4.92% | 15.29% | 7.84% |
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 2.58% | -5.28% | 10.46% | 7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACSMX and CMCIX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023 | 0.86 |
The correlation between ACSMX and CMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.86 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACSMX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank
ACSMX
CMCIX
ACSMX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund (ACSMX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACSMX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 0.49 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.93 | 0.84 | +0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.09 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 0.51 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.39 | 1.28 | +0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACSMX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 0.49 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.35 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
ACSMX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACSMX drawdown since its inception was -98.41%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSMX and CMCIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACSMX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.41% | -21.50% | -76.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.04% | -11.68% | -4.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.13% | -10.04% | -88.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.52% | -6.25% | -30.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.82% | 4.68% | +1.14% |
Volatility
ACSMX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison
Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund (ACSMX) has a higher volatility of 6.23% compared to Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) at 5.36%. This indicates that ACSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACSMX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.23% | 5.36% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.54% | 11.14% | +2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 16.02% | +2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2,831.52% | 16.70% | +2,814.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2,814.79% | 16.70% | +2,798.09% |
ACSMX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACSMX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACSMX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison
ACSMX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSMX Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 4.14% | 4.25% | 7.13% | 0.60% |