ACP vs. CBLDX
ACP (abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund) and CBLDX (CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, ACP returned -0.18%/yr vs 5.09%/yr for CBLDX. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ACP charges 1.97%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for CBLDX.
Performance
ACP vs. CBLDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACP achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly higher than CBLDX's 1.66% return.
ACP
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- 6M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- 2.65%
- 1Y
- -0.14%
- 3Y*
- 6.94%
- 5Y*
- -0.18%
- 10Y*
- 5.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.72%
CBLDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- 6.11%
- 5Y*
- 5.09%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.09M | $2.75M | $2.45M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
ACP vs. CBLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACP abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund | 2.65% | 6.48% | 4.81% | 19.27% | -22.87% | 6.65% | 7.51% | 26.93% | -19.64% |
CBLDX CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund | 1.66% | 6.04% | 7.11% | 7.71% | 0.66% | 7.44% | 3.59% | 3.50% | 1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACP and CBLDX is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2018 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACP vs. CBLDX — Risk / Return Rank
ACP
CBLDX
ACP vs. CBLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund (ACP) and CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACP | CBLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.67 | -0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 5.11 | -5.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | 16.19 | -16.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACP vs. CBLDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACP drawdown since its inception was -51.03%, which is greater than CBLDX's maximum drawdown of -8.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACP and CBLDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACP | CBLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.03% | -8.15% | -42.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.51% | -0.73% | -9.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.97% | -1.05% | -17.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.83% | -1.88% | -36.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.88% | -0.27% | -7.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.06% | -0.31% | -10.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.86% | 0.23% | +3.63% |
Volatility
ACP vs. CBLDX - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund (ACP) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX) at 0.35%. This indicates that ACP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACP | CBLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 0.35% | +3.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.07% | 1.22% | +8.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.30% | 1.49% | +10.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 1.60% | +15.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.09% | 1.82% | +19.27% |
ACP vs. CBLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACP has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than CBLDX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACP vs. CBLDX - Dividend Comparison
ACP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.53%, more than CBLDX's 5.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACP abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund | 18.53% | 17.19% | 19.72% | 17.65% | 17.70% | 11.76% | 12.73% | 12.27% | 12.60% | 10.26% | 10.72% | 12.69% |
CBLDX CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund | 5.67% | 6.43% | 7.12% | 7.65% | 5.07% | 5.13% | 3.97% | 2.85% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACP and CBLDX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACP has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to CBLDX (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACP dropped -51.03% vs CBLDX's -8.15%.
CBLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACP and CBLDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer