PCF vs. PSP
PCF (High Income Securities Fund) and PSP (Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF) are both funds - PCF is a Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Putnam Investments, while PSP is a Global Equities fund tracking the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index. PCF is actively managed, while PSP is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PCF returned 6.29%/yr vs 8.05%/yr for PSP. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PCF vs. PSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCF achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly higher than PSP's -9.18% return. Over the past 10 years, PCF has underperformed PSP with an annualized return of 6.29%, while PSP has yielded a comparatively higher 8.05% annualized return.
PCF
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -3.39%
- 1Y
- 0.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.59%
- 10Y*
- 6.29%
PSP
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- -9.18%
- 6M
- -4.61%
- 1Y
- -3.17%
- 3Y*
- 11.99%
- 5Y*
- 0.99%
- 10Y*
- 8.05%
PCF vs. PSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCF High Income Securities Fund | -3.24% | 5.31% | 16.66% | 10.45% | -15.56% | 11.44% | 8.13% | 4.22% | 5.46% | 14.58% |
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -9.18% | 6.49% | 17.42% | 37.72% | -37.37% | 27.30% | 12.47% | 35.73% | -15.12% | 24.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCF and PSP is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2006 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCF vs. PSP — Risk / Return Rank
PCF
PSP
PCF vs. PSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for High Income Securities Fund (PCF) and Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCF | PSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.01 | -0.16 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.09 | -0.10 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.99 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.05 | -0.14 | +0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.14 | -0.33 | +0.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCF | PSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 | -0.16 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.04 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.09 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
PCF vs. PSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCF drawdown since its inception was -53.82%, smaller than the maximum PSP drawdown of -85.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCF and PSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCF | PSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.82% | -85.40% | +31.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.73% | -22.37% | +11.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.74% | -22.94% | +9.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.06% | -47.16% | +18.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.13% | -47.16% | +2.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.19% | -13.62% | +8.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.50% | -30.70% | +20.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 9.61% | -5.55% |
Volatility
PCF vs. PSP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for High Income Securities Fund (PCF) is 2.75%, while Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that PCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCF | PSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 4.90% | -2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.99% | 15.50% | -6.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.48% | 19.34% | -8.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 23.70% | -7.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 22.40% | -4.91% |
Dividends
PCF vs. PSP - Dividend Comparison
PCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.46%, more than PSP's 6.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCF High Income Securities Fund | 12.46% | 11.57% | 11.29% | 11.29% | 13.48% | 10.82% | 11.46% | 3.29% | 6.88% | 3.97% | 4.52% | 5.07% |
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 6.36% | 5.87% | 8.62% | 3.96% | 2.88% | 10.34% | 4.66% | 5.87% | 6.81% | 10.18% | 4.12% | 6.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCF and PSP have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSP has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to PCF (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCF dropped -53.82% vs PSP's -85.40%.
PCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.01 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCF and PSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer