PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ACLS vs. AMBA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ACLSAMBA
YTD Return-20.18%-25.00%
1Y Return-15.90%-27.07%
3Y Return (Ann)35.70%-22.22%
5Y Return (Ann)37.33%-1.96%
10Y Return (Ann)31.14%6.40%
Sharpe Ratio-0.28-0.57
Daily Std Dev45.18%45.57%
Max Drawdown-99.34%-81.10%
Current Drawdown-48.36%-78.80%

Fundamentals


ACLSAMBA
Market Cap$3.36B$1.77B
EPS$7.43-$4.25
PE Ratio13.873.75
PEG Ratio1.234.97
Revenue (TTM)$1.13B$226.47M
Gross Profit (TTM)$401.79M$211.96M
EBITDA (TTM)$273.26M-$141.25M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between ACLS and AMBA is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

ACLS vs. AMBA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ACLS achieves a -20.18% return, which is significantly higher than AMBA's -25.00% return. Over the past 10 years, ACLS has outperformed AMBA with an annualized return of 31.14%, while AMBA has yielded a comparatively lower 6.40% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%1,000.00%2,000.00%3,000.00%4,000.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
2,595.83%
658.58%
ACLS
AMBA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Axcelis Technologies, Inc.

Ambarella, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ACLS vs. AMBA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) and Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACLS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ACLS, currently valued at -0.28, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.28
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ACLS, currently valued at -0.10, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.10
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ACLS, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.99
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ACLS, currently valued at -0.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.24
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ACLS, currently valued at -0.42, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.42
AMBA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMBA, currently valued at -0.57, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.57
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMBA, currently valued at -0.54, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.54
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AMBA, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.93
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMBA, currently valued at -0.32, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.32
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AMBA, currently valued at -0.79, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.79

ACLS vs. AMBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACLS Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is higher than the AMBA Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of ACLS and AMBA.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-0.28
-0.57
ACLS
AMBA

Dividends

ACLS vs. AMBA - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACLS nor AMBA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ACLS vs. AMBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACLS drawdown since its inception was -99.34%, which is greater than AMBA's maximum drawdown of -81.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLS and AMBA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-48.36%
-78.80%
ACLS
AMBA

Volatility

ACLS vs. AMBA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) is 11.22%, while Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) has a volatility of 11.95%. This indicates that ACLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
11.22%
11.95%
ACLS
AMBA

Financials

ACLS vs. AMBA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Axcelis Technologies, Inc. and Ambarella, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items