PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACKY vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACKY vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF (ACKY) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACKY achieves a -1.39% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 60.58% return.


ACKY

1D
0.83%
1M
-3.12%
YTD
-1.39%
6M
-2.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USL

1D
-1.53%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
60.58%
6M
56.11%
1Y
56.55%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
17.05%
10Y*
10.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACKY vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ACKY and USL is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025

-0.26

ACKY vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACKY
USL

Consumer Cyclical

44.7%

-

Communication Services

30.9%

-

Real Estate

22.5%

-

Industrials

1.8%

-

Financial Services

0.0%
4.5%

Technology

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

ACKY
44.7%
USL

-

Communication Services

ACKY
30.9%
USL

-

Real Estate

ACKY
22.5%
USL

-

Industrials

ACKY
1.8%
USL

-

Financial Services

ACKY
0.0%
USL
4.5%

Technology

ACKY
0.0%
USL

-

Basic Materials

ACKY

-

USL

-

Consumer Defensive

ACKY

-

USL

-

Energy

ACKY

-

USL

-

Healthcare

ACKY

-

USL

-

Utilities

ACKY

-

USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACKY vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACKY

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACKY vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF (ACKY) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ACKY vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACKYUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.01

+0.08

Drawdowns

ACKY vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACKY drawdown since its inception was -14.63%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACKY and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACKYUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.63%

-89.06%

+74.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.06%

-39.10%

+34.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.17%

-61.45%

+58.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.27%

Volatility

ACKY vs. USL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACKYUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

28.59%

-13.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

30.09%

-14.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.13%

32.34%

-17.21%

ACKY vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACKY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACKY vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

ACKY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.97%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


ACKY and USL have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USL is cheaper at 0.88% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USL is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ACKY.

ACKY has the higher dividend yield at 11.97%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

ACKY is categorized as Derivative Income, while USL is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ACKY and 0.88% for USL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACKY and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer