PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACKY vs. POW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACKY vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF (ACKY) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACKY achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 35.68% return.


ACKY

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.53%
6M
-4.64%
YTD
-0.98%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

POW

1D
-3.68%
1M
-13.79%
6M
25.01%
YTD
35.68%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACKY vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ACKY and POW is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACKY vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF (ACKY) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ACKY vs. POW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACKY vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACKY drawdown since its inception was -14.63%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACKY and POW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACKYPOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.63%

-20.28%

+5.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.67%

-20.28%

+15.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-4.56%

+0.90%

Volatility

ACKY vs. POW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACKYPOWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.72%

33.06%

-17.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

33.06%

-17.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

33.06%

-17.34%

ACKY vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACKY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACKY vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

ACKY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.26%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ACKY and POW have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, POW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

POW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ACKY.

ACKY has the higher dividend yield at 13.26%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

ACKY is categorized as Derivative Income, while POW is Actively Managed. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ACKY and 0.75% for POW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACKY and POW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer