PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACIW vs. BMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ACIW vs. BMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW) and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACIW achieves a -5.38% return, which is significantly lower than BMY's 8.27% return. Over the past 10 years, ACIW has outperformed BMY with an annualized return of 8.12%, while BMY has yielded a comparatively lower 1.00% annualized return.


ACIW

1D
1.98%
1M
10.69%
YTD
-5.38%
6M
-4.82%
1Y
0.38%
3Y*
24.77%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
8.12%

BMY

1D
0.40%
1M
0.63%
YTD
8.27%
6M
11.43%
1Y
20.57%
3Y*
0.45%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
1.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACIW vs. BMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACIW
ACI Worldwide, Inc.
-5.38%-7.90%69.64%33.04%-33.72%-9.71%1.43%36.94%22.06%24.90%
BMY
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
8.27%0.11%15.81%-26.14%18.98%2.88%0.41%27.74%-12.90%7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ACIW and BMY is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 1995

0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACIW:

$4.65B

BMY:

$116.75B

EPS

ACIW:

$1.99

BMY:

$3.57

PE Ratio

ACIW:

22.79

BMY:

16.02

PEG Ratio

ACIW:

1.02

BMY:

0.91

PS Ratio

ACIW:

2.62

BMY:

2.40

PB Ratio

ACIW:

3.10

BMY:

5.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACIW:

$1.79B

BMY:

$48.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACIW:

$878.23M

BMY:

$33.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

ACIW:

$412.16M

BMY:

$13.34B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACIW vs. BMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACIW
ACIW Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ACIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACIW Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
ACIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACIW Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

BMY
BMY Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMY Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
BMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMY Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACIW vs. BMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW) and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACIWBMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.14

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

1.53

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.23

3.32

-3.55

ACIW vs. BMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACIW Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the BMY Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACIW and BMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACIW vs. BMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACIW drawdown since its inception was -90.10%, which is greater than BMY's maximum drawdown of -72.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACIW and BMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACIWBMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.10%

-72.03%

-18.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.25%

-12.05%

-16.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.02%

-36.85%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.40%

-47.67%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.18%

-47.67%

-6.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.58%

-17.79%

-5.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.86%

-22.38%

-11.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.26%

6.34%

+8.92%

Volatility

ACIW vs. BMY - Volatility Comparison

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) at 8.22%. This indicates that ACIW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACIWBMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.29%

8.22%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.94%

18.18%

+8.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.82%

27.08%

+5.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.19%

24.02%

+11.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.67%

25.29%

+10.38%

Dividends

ACIW vs. BMY - Dividend Comparison

ACIW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACIW
ACI Worldwide, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BMY
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
4.38%4.60%4.24%4.44%3.00%2.36%3.69%2.55%3.08%2.55%1.95%2.17%

Financials

ACIW vs. BMY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ACI Worldwide, Inc. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
425.75M
11.49B
(ACIW) Total Revenue
(BMY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ACIW vs. BMY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ACI Worldwide, Inc. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
46.3%
70.2%
Portfolio components
ACIW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACI Worldwide, Inc. reported a gross profit of 197.29M and revenue of 425.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.3%.

BMY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported a gross profit of 8.07B and revenue of 11.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.2%.

ACIW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACI Worldwide, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.49M and revenue of 425.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.5%.

BMY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported an operating income of 3.27B and revenue of 11.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.5%.

ACIW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACI Worldwide, Inc. reported a net income of 38.31M and revenue of 425.75M, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.

BMY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported a net income of 2.68B and revenue of 11.49B, resulting in a net margin of 23.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ACIW and BMY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACIW has higher volatility (9.29%) compared to BMY (8.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACIW dropped -90.10% vs BMY's -72.03%.

BMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACIW and BMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer