PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMY vs. SNY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BMY vs. SNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) and Sanofi (SNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMY achieves a 25.17% return, which is significantly higher than SNY's -6.17% return. Over the past 10 years, BMY has underperformed SNY with an annualized return of 2.16%, while SNY has yielded a comparatively higher 4.59% annualized return.


BMY

1D
0.69%
1M
12.35%
6M
21.21%
YTD
25.17%
1Y
54.75%
3Y*
6.92%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
2.16%
ALL TIME*
9.43%

SNY

1D
0.44%
1M
-0.19%
6M
-3.34%
YTD
-6.17%
1Y
-2.74%
3Y*
-2.29%
5Y*
0.72%
10Y*
4.59%
ALL TIME*
5.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$711.50M$665.03M$681.59M
$172.97M$151.05M$146.29M

BMY vs. SNY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BMY
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
25.17%0.11%15.81%-26.14%18.98%2.88%0.41%27.74%-12.90%7.71%
SNY
Sanofi
-6.17%4.93%1.09%6.55%0.57%7.00%0.39%20.47%6.06%9.96%

Correlation

The correlation between BMY and SNY is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2002

0.39

The correlation between BMY and SNY shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (10 years) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BMY:

$133.37B

SNY:

$103.44B

EPS

BMY:

$4.54

SNY:

€1.63

PE Ratio

BMY:

14.37

SNY:

22.94

PEG Ratio

BMY:

0.82

SNY:

2.11

PS Ratio

BMY:

2.71

SNY:

1.86

PB Ratio

BMY:

5.99

SNY:

1.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

BMY:

$49.19B

SNY:

€48.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BMY:

$34.51B

SNY:

€35.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

BMY:

$16.67B

SNY:

€12.41B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMY vs. SNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BMY
BMY Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
BMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

SNY
SNY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNY Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNY Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BMY vs. SNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) and Sanofi (SNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BMYSNYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.02

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.66

-0.02

+4.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.09

-0.04

+11.13

BMY vs. SNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMY Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the SNY Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMY and SNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BMY vs. SNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMY drawdown since its inception was -72.03%, which is greater than SNY's maximum drawdown of -46.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMY and SNY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMYSNYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.03%

-46.46%

-25.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.53%

-16.70%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.11%

-23.37%

-10.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.67%

-33.52%

-14.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.67%

-33.52%

-14.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.95%

-20.08%

+15.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.36%

-12.24%

-10.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.25%

9.59%

-4.34%

Volatility

BMY vs. SNY - Volatility Comparison

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) has a higher volatility of 9.10% compared to Sanofi (SNY) at 8.66%. This indicates that BMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMYSNYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.10%

8.66%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.64%

17.58%

+2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.86%

26.74%

+1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.49%

25.17%

-0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.46%

23.49%

+1.97%

Dividends

BMY vs. SNY - Dividend Comparison

BMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than SNY's 5.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMY
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
3.84%4.60%4.24%4.44%3.00%2.36%3.69%2.55%3.08%2.55%1.95%2.17%
SNY
Sanofi
5.62%4.56%4.22%3.83%4.32%3.80%3.61%3.47%4.29%3.82%4.11%3.77%

Financials

BMY vs. SNY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Sanofi. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

BMY vs. SNY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Sanofi over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

BMY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported a gross profit of 9.25B and revenue of 12.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.3%.

SNY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sanofi reported a gross profit of 9.28B and revenue of 12.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.5%.

BMY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported an operating income of 4.09B and revenue of 12.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.5%.

SNY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sanofi reported an operating income of 2.38B and revenue of 12.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.

BMY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported a net income of 3.32B and revenue of 12.97B, resulting in a net margin of 25.6%.

SNY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sanofi reported a net income of 343.00M and revenue of 12.30B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BMY and SNY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BMY has higher volatility (9.10%) compared to SNY (8.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMY dropped -72.03% vs SNY's -46.46%.

BMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMY and SNY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer