PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACIO vs. EAOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ACIO vs. EAOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ACIO vs. EAOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ACIO
Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF
-3.83%9.03%21.92%15.90%-10.31%18.03%11.22%
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
-0.98%12.90%7.29%11.83%-15.48%6.39%10.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACIO achieves a -3.83% return, which is significantly lower than EAOM's -0.98% return.


ACIO

1D
1.84%
1M
-3.52%
YTD
-3.83%
6M
-3.16%
1Y
8.91%
3Y*
12.20%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*

EAOM

1D
1.38%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
-0.98%
6M
0.86%
1Y
10.87%
3Y*
8.56%
5Y*
3.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ACIO vs. EAOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACIO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOM's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ACIO vs. EAOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACIO
ACIO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ACIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACIO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
ACIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACIO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOM
EAOM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EAOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACIO vs. EAOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACIOEAOMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.80

1.36

-0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.19

1.98

-0.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.28

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

1.94

-0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.55

8.22

-3.67

ACIO vs. EAOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACIO Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the EAOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACIO and EAOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACIOEAOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

1.36

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.45

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.64

+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between ACIO and EAOM is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ACIO vs. EAOM - Dividend Comparison

ACIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than EAOM's 2.92% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
ACIO
Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF
0.42%0.37%0.44%0.72%1.51%0.61%1.02%1.32%
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
2.92%2.89%2.89%2.70%1.93%1.32%1.02%0.00%

Drawdowns

ACIO vs. EAOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACIO drawdown since its inception was -14.19%, smaller than the maximum EAOM drawdown of -20.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACIO and EAOM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ACIOEAOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.19%

-20.73%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-5.67%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.00%

-20.73%

+6.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.51%

-3.67%

-1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-5.09%

+1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

1.34%

+0.70%

Volatility

ACIO vs. EAOM - Volatility Comparison

Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) have volatilities of 3.39% and 3.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ACIOEAOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

3.32%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.42%

4.81%

+1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.12%

8.03%

+3.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.09%

8.02%

+3.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.71%

7.91%

+3.80%