ACIO vs. XTR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ACIO (Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF) and XTR (Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACIO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors, while XTR is a Equity Hedged fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index. ACIO is actively managed, while XTR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ACIO returned 15.24%/yr vs 17.45%/yr for XTR. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACIO charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XTR.

Performance

ACIO vs. XTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO) and Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACIO achieves a 6.05% return, which is significantly lower than XTR's 7.44% return.

ACIO

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -0.45%
• YTD: 6.05%
• 6M: 5.72%
• 1Y: 15.07%
• 3Y*: 15.24%
• 5Y*: 9.91%
• 10Y*: —

XTR

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 7.44%
• 6M: 7.03%
• 1Y: 21.44%
• 3Y*: 17.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACIO vs. XTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ACIO Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF	6.05%	9.03%	21.92%	15.90%	-10.31%	5.64%
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF	7.44%	13.66%	21.85%	21.16%	-17.67%	4.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ACIO and XTR is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021	0.94

The correlation between ACIO and XTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ACIO vs. XTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACIO

ACIO Risk / Return Rank: 49
ACIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
ACIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
ACIO Omega Ratio Rank: 52
ACIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
ACIO Martin Ratio Rank: 50

XTR

XTR Risk / Return Rank: 57
XTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
XTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
XTR Omega Ratio Rank: 55
XTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
XTR Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACIO vs. XTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO) and Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACIO	XTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	1.90	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	2.62	-0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.34	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	2.53	-0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.17	10.48	-2.31

ACIO vs. XTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACIO Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the XTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACIO and XTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACIO vs. XTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACIO drawdown since its inception was -14.19%, smaller than the maximum XTR drawdown of -20.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACIO and XTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACIO	XTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.19%	-20.83%	+6.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.22%	-8.51%	+1.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.12%	-14.35%	+2.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.72%	-1.76%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.18%	-5.91%	+2.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	2.05%	-0.20%

Volatility

ACIO vs. XTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO) is 3.46%, while Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that ACIO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACIO	XTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.46%	4.54%	-1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.77%	9.00%	-2.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.79%	11.36%	-2.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.12%	13.85%	-2.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.67%	13.85%	-2.18%

ACIO vs. XTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACIO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than XTR's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACIO vs. XTR - Dividend Comparison

ACIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than XTR's 16.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ACIO Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF	0.38%	0.37%	0.44%	0.72%	1.51%	0.61%	1.02%	1.32%
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF	16.59%	17.82%	20.89%	1.09%	1.08%	2.32%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACIO and XTR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, ACIO and XTR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ACIO or XTR?

XTR has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to ACIO (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACIO dropped -14.19% vs XTR's -20.83%.

Which ETF is better, ACIO or XTR?

On 3-year performance, XTR leads with 17.45% vs 15.24% for ACIO. On fees, XTR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, ACIO has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ACIO or XTR?

Over the 3-year period, XTR has performed better with a 17.45% return vs 15.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACIO or XTR?

XTR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ACIO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACIO or XTR?

XTR has the higher dividend yield at 16.59%, compared with 0.38% for ACIO.

What is the main difference between ACIO and XTR?

ACIO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while XTR is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ACIO and 0.25% for XTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.