PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACII vs. DDDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACII vs. DDDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII) and YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ACII

1D
-0.95%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DDDD

1D
0.05%
1M
2.56%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACII vs. DDDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ACII and DDDD is -0.60, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

-0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACII vs. DDDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII) and YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ACII vs. DDDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACIIDDDDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-7.55

2.55

-10.10

Drawdowns

ACII vs. DDDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACII drawdown since its inception was -1.27%, smaller than the maximum DDDD drawdown of -1.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACII and DDDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACIIDDDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.27%

-1.88%

+0.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-1.22%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.42%

-0.60%

+0.18%

Volatility

ACII vs. DDDD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACIIDDDDDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.65%

9.69%

-2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.65%

9.69%

-2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.65%

9.69%

-2.04%

ACII vs. DDDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACII has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than DDDD's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACII vs. DDDD - Dividend Comparison

ACII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while DDDD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


ACII and DDDD have a correlation of -0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACII is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACII is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DDDD.

ACII has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for DDDD.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ACII and 0.99% for DDDD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACII and DDDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer