ACGR vs. BBUS
ACGR (American Century Large Cap Growth ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - ACGR tracks the Russell 1000 Growth Index while BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACGR returned 15.06%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for BBUS. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACGR charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
ACGR vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACGR achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 10.60% return.
ACGR
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 6.10%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 24.19%
- 3Y*
- 21.44%
- 5Y*
- 15.06%
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
ACGR vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF | 7.39% | 14.50% | 26.66% | 43.24% | -30.13% | 39.24% | 11.27% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 10.60% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 17.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACGR and BBUS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2020 | 0.80 |
The correlation between ACGR and BBUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACGR vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
ACGR
BBUS
ACGR vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACGR | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.42 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 3.00 | -1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.20 | 13.76 | -8.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACGR | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.33 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.79 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.84 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
ACGR vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACGR drawdown since its inception was -34.54%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACGR and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACGR | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.54% | -35.35% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.84% | -9.21% | -6.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.58% | -19.01% | -5.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.54% | -25.46% | -9.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -0.74% | -0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.50% | -5.46% | -3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.66% | 2.00% | +2.66% |
Volatility
ACGR vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that ACGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACGR | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 2.88% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.95% | 8.96% | +2.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.49% | 11.87% | +3.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.51% | 17.03% | +4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 19.59% | +1.83% |
ACGR vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACGR has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACGR vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
ACGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.09% | 0.11% | 0.23% | 0.37% | 0.48% | 0.58% | 1.44% | 0.00% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, ACGR and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ACGR has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACGR dropped -34.54% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, ACGR leads with 15.06% vs 13.43% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ACGR has performed better with a 15.06% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ACGR.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.09% for ACGR.
ACGR tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ACGR and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACGR and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer