ACEP vs. SPXM
ACEP (ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF) and SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACEP charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SPXM.
Performance
ACEP vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ACEP
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -3.21%
- 6M
- 12.92%
- YTD
- 20.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 8.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACEP vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACEP ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF | 20.32% | 8.00% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.00% | 4.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACEP and SPXM is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACEP vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank
ACEP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPXM
ACEP vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACEP | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.11 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACEP vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACEP drawdown since its inception was -7.06%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACEP and SPXM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACEP | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -5.08% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.91% | -0.75% | -3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.66% | -0.78% | -0.88% |
Volatility
ACEP vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACEP | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.26% | 7.65% | +9.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 7.59% | +9.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 7.59% | +9.67% |
ACEP vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACEP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACEP vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison
ACEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than SPXM's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACEP ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF | 0.11% | 0.14% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.24% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACEP and SPXM have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACEP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACEP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SPXM.
SPXM has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.11% for ACEP.
They also come from different issuers: ARS Investment Partners and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACEP and 0.47% for SPXM.
Find the right allocation for ACEP and SPXM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer