PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACEI vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACEI vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACEI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACEI achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.67% return.


ACEI

1D
1.09%
1M
-0.52%
6M
0.92%
YTD
-0.49%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

QYLD

1D
0.65%
1M
-0.98%
6M
5.88%
YTD
7.67%
1Y
20.66%
3Y*
12.32%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
9.59%
ALL TIME*
8.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$489.67K$544.80K$508.18K
$83.30M$78.68M$98.28M

ACEI vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ACEI and QYLD is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACEI vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ACEI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ACEI vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACEI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACEIQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.70

ACEI vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACEI vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACEI drawdown since its inception was -9.30%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACEI and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACEIQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.30%

-24.75%

+15.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.88%

-2.96%

-2.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.45%

-3.81%

+1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

Volatility

ACEI vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACEIQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.56%

11.26%

+2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.56%

15.04%

-1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.56%

15.63%

-2.07%

ACEI vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACEI has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACEI vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

ACEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.95%, less than QYLD's 11.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACEI
Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF
9.95%2.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.89%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACEI and QYLD have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ACEI.

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.89%, compared with 9.95% for ACEI.

ACEI is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ACEI and 0.60% for QYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACEI and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer