PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACCBX vs. VBF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACCBX vs. VBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Corporate Bond Fund (ACCBX) and Invesco Bond Fund (VBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACCBX achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly higher than VBF's -0.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ACCBX having a 2.96% annualized return and VBF not far behind at 2.94%.


ACCBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.90%
YTD
0.62%
6M
0.56%
1Y
6.46%
3Y*
5.28%
5Y*
0.07%
10Y*
2.96%

VBF

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
-0.95%
6M
-1.57%
1Y
2.21%
3Y*
5.57%
5Y*
-0.88%
10Y*
2.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACCBX vs. VBF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACCBX
Invesco Corporate Bond Fund
0.62%7.34%2.87%7.01%-16.72%0.31%11.43%15.78%-4.13%7.27%
VBF
Invesco Bond Fund
-0.95%5.46%6.97%2.27%-17.77%-5.37%12.80%30.91%-11.16%13.35%

Correlation

The correlation between ACCBX and VBF is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 1994

0.19

Over the past year, ACCBX and VBF have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACCBX vs. VBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACCBX
ACCBX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ACCBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACCBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACCBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ACCBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACCBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

VBF
VBF Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
VBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBF Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
VBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBF Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACCBX vs. VBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Corporate Bond Fund (ACCBX) and Invesco Bond Fund (VBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACCBXVBFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.07

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

0.55

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

1.52

+5.13

ACCBX vs. VBF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACCBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the VBF Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACCBX and VBF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACCBXVBFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

0.37

+1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

-0.07

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.23

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.33

+0.18

Drawdowns

ACCBX vs. VBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACCBX drawdown since its inception was -45.26%, which is greater than VBF's maximum drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACCBX and VBF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACCBXVBFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.26%

-32.23%

-13.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.46%

-4.03%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.72%

-11.52%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.59%

-32.23%

+8.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.59%

-32.23%

+8.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.72%

-11.75%

+9.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.86%

-7.25%

-3.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

1.46%

-0.46%

Volatility

ACCBX vs. VBF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Corporate Bond Fund (ACCBX) is 1.43%, while Invesco Bond Fund (VBF) has a volatility of 1.74%. This indicates that ACCBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACCBXVBFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.43%

1.74%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.03%

4.54%

-1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

6.05%

-1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.28%

12.38%

-6.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.73%

12.73%

-7.00%

ACCBX vs. VBF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACCBX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than VBF's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACCBX vs. VBF - Dividend Comparison

ACCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, less than VBF's 5.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACCBX
Invesco Corporate Bond Fund
5.00%4.95%4.63%3.78%3.84%4.91%5.98%3.67%4.22%4.13%3.64%3.88%
VBF
Invesco Bond Fund
5.54%5.46%5.51%5.31%4.60%3.36%6.89%5.04%5.40%5.07%4.56%5.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACCBX and VBF have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBF has higher volatility (1.74%) compared to ACCBX (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACCBX dropped -45.26% vs VBF's -32.23%.

ACCBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACCBX and VBF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer