PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBF vs. NBB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBF vs. NBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bond Fund (VBF) and Nuveen Taxable Municipal Income Fund (NBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBF achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly lower than NBB's 1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, VBF has outperformed NBB with an annualized return of 2.99%, while NBB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.74% annualized return.


VBF

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.18%
YTD
-0.64%
6M
-0.77%
1Y
2.16%
3Y*
5.60%
5Y*
-1.65%
10Y*
2.99%

NBB

1D
-1.40%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.74%
1Y
7.94%
3Y*
7.60%
5Y*
-0.92%
10Y*
2.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBF vs. NBB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBF
Invesco Bond Fund
-0.64%5.46%6.97%2.27%-17.77%-5.37%12.80%30.91%-11.16%13.35%
NBB
Nuveen Taxable Municipal Income Fund
1.42%13.52%1.32%7.62%-24.60%0.91%14.45%19.48%-6.37%12.96%

Correlation

The correlation between VBF and NBB is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2010

0.23

The correlation between VBF and NBB shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.40 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBF vs. NBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBF
VBF Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
VBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
VBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBF Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

NBB
NBB Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
NBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBB Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
NBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBB Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBF vs. NBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bond Fund (VBF) and Nuveen Taxable Municipal Income Fund (NBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBFNBBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.14

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

1.17

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.42

3.56

-2.14

VBF vs. NBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBF Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the NBB Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBF and NBB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VBF vs. NBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBF drawdown since its inception was -32.23%, roughly equal to the maximum NBB drawdown of -33.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBF and NBB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBFNBBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.23%

-33.51%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

-6.81%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.52%

-11.39%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.23%

-33.51%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.23%

-33.51%

+1.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.48%

-7.30%

-4.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.25%

-7.66%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

2.24%

-0.72%

Volatility

VBF vs. NBB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Bond Fund (VBF) is 1.64%, while Nuveen Taxable Municipal Income Fund (NBB) has a volatility of 2.58%. This indicates that VBF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBFNBBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.64%

2.58%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.54%

7.39%

-2.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.02%

9.94%

-3.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.36%

13.78%

-1.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.74%

14.28%

-1.54%

VBF vs. NBB - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBF has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than NBB's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

VBF vs. NBB - Dividend Comparison

VBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, less than NBB's 7.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBB
Nuveen Taxable Municipal Income Fund
7.50%7.33%6.96%8.33%7.86%5.50%4.67%5.54%6.38%5.62%6.35%6.79%
VBF
Invesco Bond Fund
5.53%5.46%5.51%5.31%4.60%3.36%6.89%5.04%5.40%5.07%4.56%5.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBF and NBB have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBB has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to VBF (1.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBF dropped -32.23% vs NBB's -33.51%.

NBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBF and NBB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer