ACCBX vs. SMARX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Corporate Bond Fund (ACCBX) and Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX).
ACCBX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Sep 23, 1971. SMARX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 3, 2005.
Performance
ACCBX vs. SMARX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ACCBX vs. SMARX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACCBX Invesco Corporate Bond Fund | -1.26% | 7.34% | 2.87% | 7.01% | -16.72% | 0.31% | 11.43% | 15.78% | -4.13% | 7.27% |
SMARX Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust | -0.18% | 6.91% | 3.73% | 9.76% | -11.77% | 0.76% | 6.55% | 7.77% | -1.13% | 4.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACCBX achieves a -1.26% return, which is significantly lower than SMARX's -0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, ACCBX has underperformed SMARX with an annualized return of 3.03%, while SMARX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.35% annualized return.
ACCBX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -2.22%
- YTD
- -1.26%
- 6M
- -0.82%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- 4.38%
- 5Y*
- -0.07%
- 10Y*
- 3.03%
SMARX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 5.23%
- 5Y*
- 1.94%
- 10Y*
- 3.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ACCBX vs. SMARX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACCBX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than SMARX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ACCBX vs. SMARX — Risk / Return Rank
ACCBX
SMARX
ACCBX vs. SMARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Corporate Bond Fund (ACCBX) and Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACCBX | SMARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 1.04 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 1.48 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.19 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 1.79 | -0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.62 | 5.69 | -1.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACCBX | SMARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 1.04 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.38 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.77 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.41 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between ACCBX and SMARX is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ACCBX vs. SMARX - Dividend Comparison
ACCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than SMARX's 4.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACCBX Invesco Corporate Bond Fund | 4.62% | 4.95% | 4.63% | 3.78% | 3.84% | 4.91% | 5.98% | 3.67% | 4.22% | 4.13% | 3.64% | 3.88% |
SMARX Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust | 4.70% | 5.02% | 4.07% | 3.85% | 3.53% | 2.57% | 3.35% | 4.19% | 4.55% | 4.20% | 4.87% | 5.24% |
Drawdowns
ACCBX vs. SMARX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACCBX drawdown since its inception was -45.26%, roughly equal to the maximum SMARX drawdown of -47.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACCBX and SMARX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACCBX | SMARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.26% | -47.07% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.46% | -2.63% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.59% | -16.20% | -7.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.59% | -16.20% | -7.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.54% | -1.86% | -2.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.88% | -7.02% | -3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | 0.83% | +0.24% |
Volatility
ACCBX vs. SMARX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Corporate Bond Fund (ACCBX) has a higher volatility of 1.76% compared to Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX) at 1.66%. This indicates that ACCBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACCBX | SMARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.76% | 1.66% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.71% | 2.55% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.53% | 4.03% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.25% | 5.12% | +1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.71% | 4.37% | +1.34% |