SMARX vs. GSGDX
SMARX (Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust) and GSGDX (Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, SMARX returned 2.99%/yr vs 2.78%/yr for GSGDX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMARX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for GSGDX.
Performance
SMARX vs. GSGDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMARX achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly higher than GSGDX's 0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, SMARX has outperformed GSGDX with an annualized return of 2.99%, while GSGDX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.78% annualized return.
SMARX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 4.99%
- 3Y*
- 5.68%
- 5Y*
- 1.74%
- 10Y*
- 2.99%
GSGDX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 5.83%
- 3Y*
- 5.18%
- 5Y*
- 0.12%
- 10Y*
- 2.78%
SMARX vs. GSGDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMARX Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust | 0.87% | 6.91% | 3.73% | 9.76% | -11.77% | 0.76% | 6.55% | 7.77% | -1.13% | 4.75% |
GSGDX Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund | 0.65% | 8.23% | 1.93% | 8.81% | -17.33% | -0.97% | 10.12% | 16.83% | -2.55% | 6.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMARX and GSGDX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2005 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, SMARX and GSGDX have become more correlated (0.92) than their long-term average of 0.70, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMARX vs. GSGDX — Risk / Return Rank
SMARX
GSGDX
SMARX vs. GSGDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX) and Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMARX | GSGDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 1.71 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | 5.63 | +0.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMARX vs. GSGDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMARX drawdown since its inception was -47.07%, which is greater than GSGDX's maximum drawdown of -23.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMARX and GSGDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMARX | GSGDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.07% | -23.48% | -23.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.61% | -3.52% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.19% | -6.98% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.20% | -23.48% | +7.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.20% | -23.48% | +7.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -1.36% | +0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.96% | -3.87% | -3.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 1.06% | -0.29% |
Volatility
SMARX vs. GSGDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX) is 1.23%, while Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX) has a volatility of 1.37%. This indicates that SMARX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSGDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMARX | GSGDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 1.37% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.89% | 3.43% | -0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 4.46% | -0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.16% | 6.85% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 6.41% | -2.02% |
SMARX vs. GSGDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMARX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than GSGDX's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMARX vs. GSGDX - Dividend Comparison
SMARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, less than GSGDX's 4.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSGDX Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund | 4.82% | 4.75% | 3.94% | 3.52% | 2.74% | 5.10% | 4.18% | 5.89% | 3.56% | 3.19% | 3.38% | 3.76% |
SMARX Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust | 4.76% | 5.02% | 4.07% | 3.85% | 3.53% | 2.57% | 3.35% | 4.19% | 4.55% | 4.20% | 4.87% | 5.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, SMARX and GSGDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GSGDX has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to SMARX (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMARX dropped -47.07% vs GSGDX's -23.48%.
GSGDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMARX and GSGDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer