ACA.PA vs. MC.PA
Compare and contrast key facts about Crédit Agricole S.A. (ACA.PA) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA).
Performance
ACA.PA vs. MC.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ACA.PA vs. MC.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACA.PA Crédit Agricole S.A. | -5.53% | 41.06% | 10.71% | 43.34% | -13.60% | 29.37% | -20.15% | 46.53% | -28.33% | 22.20% |
MC.PA LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne | -26.97% | 3.93% | -11.73% | 9.60% | -4.76% | 43.83% | 24.66% | 63.17% | 7.31% | 37.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACA.PA achieves a -5.53% return, which is significantly higher than MC.PA's -26.97% return. Over the past 10 years, ACA.PA has underperformed MC.PA with an annualized return of 12.41%, while MC.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.18% annualized return.
ACA.PA
- 1D
- 4.08%
- 1M
- -9.84%
- YTD
- -5.53%
- 6M
- -2.59%
- 1Y
- 4.12%
- 3Y*
- 25.98%
- 5Y*
- 14.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.41%
MC.PA
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -6.20%
- YTD
- -26.97%
- 6M
- -12.49%
- 1Y
- -16.14%
- 3Y*
- -16.06%
- 5Y*
- -2.11%
- 10Y*
- 14.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACA.PA vs. MC.PA — Risk / Return Rank
ACA.PA
MC.PA
ACA.PA vs. MC.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crédit Agricole S.A. (ACA.PA) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACA.PA | MC.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.18 | -0.49 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.38 | -0.54 | +0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.93 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | -0.17 | +0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.34 | -0.41 | +2.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACA.PA | MC.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 | -0.49 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | -0.07 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.50 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.41 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between ACA.PA and MC.PA is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ACA.PA vs. MC.PA - Dividend Comparison
ACA.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, more than MC.PA's 2.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACA.PA Crédit Agricole S.A. | 6.63% | 6.27% | 7.90% | 8.17% | 10.68% | 6.37% | 0.00% | 5.34% | 6.68% | 4.35% | 5.09% | 3.22% |
MC.PA LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne | 2.76% | 2.02% | 2.05% | 1.70% | 1.76% | 0.96% | 0.90% | 1.50% | 2.09% | 1.71% | 1.98% | 2.28% |
Drawdowns
ACA.PA vs. MC.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACA.PA drawdown since its inception was -88.79%, which is greater than MC.PA's maximum drawdown of -70.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACA.PA and MC.PA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACA.PA | MC.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.79% | -70.25% | -18.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.69% | -30.11% | +13.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.47% | -49.03% | +12.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.95% | -49.03% | -7.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.85% | -44.65% | +31.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.78% | -16.25% | -22.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.37% | 12.18% | -6.81% |
Volatility
ACA.PA vs. MC.PA - Volatility Comparison
Crédit Agricole S.A. (ACA.PA) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) at 6.59%. This indicates that ACA.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MC.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACA.PA | MC.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.45% | 6.59% | +1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.67% | 22.24% | -6.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.48% | 32.44% | -9.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 29.47% | -6.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.72% | 27.74% | +0.98% |
Financials
ACA.PA vs. MC.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crédit Agricole S.A. and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities