ACA.PA vs. NVDA
Compare and contrast key facts about Crédit Agricole S.A. (ACA.PA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ACA.PA or NVDA.
Correlation
The correlation between ACA.PA and NVDA is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ACA.PA vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ACA.PA:
0.81
NVDA:
0.51
ACA.PA:
1.02
NVDA:
1.02
ACA.PA:
1.15
NVDA:
1.13
ACA.PA:
0.92
NVDA:
0.74
ACA.PA:
1.86
NVDA:
1.85
ACA.PA:
8.04%
NVDA:
14.81%
ACA.PA:
20.17%
NVDA:
59.43%
ACA.PA:
-88.79%
NVDA:
-89.73%
ACA.PA:
-3.04%
NVDA:
-21.45%
Fundamentals
ACA.PA:
€49.93B
NVDA:
$2.79T
ACA.PA:
€2.11
NVDA:
$2.94
ACA.PA:
7.82
NVDA:
38.95
ACA.PA:
4.06
NVDA:
1.61
ACA.PA:
2.05
NVDA:
21.28
ACA.PA:
0.68
NVDA:
35.22
ACA.PA:
€18.10B
NVDA:
$104.45B
ACA.PA:
-€21.37B
NVDA:
$77.45B
ACA.PA:
€3.71B
NVDA:
$68.38B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACA.PA achieves a 26.19% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's -12.59% return. Over the past 10 years, ACA.PA has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 7.70%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 72.94% annualized return.
ACA.PA
26.19%
10.55%
26.33%
16.66%
25.55%
7.70%
NVDA
-12.59%
21.88%
-21.15%
29.85%
72.35%
72.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ACA.PA vs. NVDA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ACA.PA
NVDA
ACA.PA vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crédit Agricole S.A. (ACA.PA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ACA.PA vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
ACA.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than NVDA's 0.03% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACA.PA Crédit Agricole S.A. | 6.26% | 7.90% | 8.17% | 10.68% | 6.37% | 0.00% | 5.34% | 6.68% | 4.35% | 5.09% | 3.22% | 3.25% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
Drawdowns
ACA.PA vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACA.PA drawdown since its inception was -88.79%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACA.PA and NVDA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ACA.PA vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Crédit Agricole S.A. (ACA.PA) is 8.14%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 22.46%. This indicates that ACA.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ACA.PA vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crédit Agricole S.A. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ACA.PA vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison
ACA.PA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Crédit Agricole S.A. reported a gross profit of 5.23B and revenue of 5.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
NVDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 28.72B and revenue of 39.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.0%.
ACA.PA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Crédit Agricole S.A. reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 5.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.1%.
NVDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 24.03B and revenue of 39.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 61.1%.
ACA.PA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Crédit Agricole S.A. reported a net income of 1.69B and revenue of 5.23B, resulting in a net margin of 32.3%.
NVDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 22.09B and revenue of 39.33B, resulting in a net margin of 56.2%.