ACA.PA vs. NVDA
Compare and contrast key facts about Crédit Agricole S.A. (ACA.PA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ACA.PA or NVDA.
Key characteristics
| ACA.PA | NVDA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 17.12% | 174.12% |
| 1Y Return | 30.44% | 208.98% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 12.06% | 84.19% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.71% | 96.03% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.41% | 78.57% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.95 | 3.72 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.33 | 3.78 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.38 | 1.48 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.30 | 7.19 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.77 | 22.58 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.92% | 8.62% |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.50% | 52.22% |
| Max Drawdown | -88.79% | -89.73% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.80% | -1.70% |
Fundamentals
| ACA.PA | NVDA | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | €42.67B | $3.33T |
| EPS | €2.03 | $2.13 |
| PE Ratio | 6.93 | 63.72 |
| PEG Ratio | 4.06 | 1.02 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | €102.25B | $96.31B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | €62.78B | $73.17B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | -€1.55B | $62.97B |
Correlation
The correlation between ACA.PA and NVDA is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ACA.PA vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ACA.PA achieves a 17.12% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 174.12% return. Over the past 10 years, ACA.PA has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 8.41%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 78.57% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ACA.PA vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crédit Agricole S.A. (ACA.PA) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ACA.PA vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
ACA.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.47%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACA.PA Crédit Agricole S.A. | 7.47% | 8.17% | 10.68% | 6.37% | 0.00% | 5.34% | 6.68% | 4.35% | 5.09% | 3.22% | 3.25% | 0.00% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.30% | 0.46% | 1.19% | 1.68% | 1.95% |
Drawdowns
ACA.PA vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACA.PA drawdown since its inception was -88.79%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACA.PA and NVDA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ACA.PA vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Crédit Agricole S.A. (ACA.PA) is 6.67%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 11.48%. This indicates that ACA.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ACA.PA vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crédit Agricole S.A. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities