ACA.PA vs. KER.PA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Crédit Agricole S.A. (ACA.PA) and Kering SA (KER.PA).

Performance

ACA.PA vs. KER.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Crédit Agricole S.A. (ACA.PA) and Kering SA (KER.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ACA.PA vs. KER.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACA.PA Crédit Agricole S.A.	-5.53%	41.06%	10.71%	43.34%	-13.60%	29.37%	-20.15%	46.53%	-28.33%	22.20%
KER.PA Kering SA	-12.21%	30.28%	-37.75%	-14.00%	-31.24%	20.44%	3.11%	45.37%	14.15%	87.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACA.PA achieves a -5.53% return, which is significantly higher than KER.PA's -12.21% return. Over the past 10 years, ACA.PA has outperformed KER.PA with an annualized return of 12.41%, while KER.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 8.66% annualized return.

ACA.PA

• 1D: 4.08%
• 1M: -9.84%
• YTD: -5.53%
• 6M: -2.59%
• 1Y: 4.12%
• 3Y*: 25.98%
• 5Y*: 14.42%
• 10Y*: 12.41%

KER.PA

• 1D: 2.57%
• 1M: -3.06%
• YTD: -12.21%
• 6M: -6.74%
• 1Y: 41.09%
• 3Y*: -21.63%
• 5Y*: -12.93%
• 10Y*: 8.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ACA.PA vs. KER.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACA.PA

ACA.PA Risk / Return Rank: 49
ACA.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
ACA.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
ACA.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 38
ACA.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
ACA.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 62

KER.PA

KER.PA Risk / Return Rank: 71
KER.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
KER.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
KER.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 65
KER.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
KER.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACA.PA vs. KER.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crédit Agricole S.A. (ACA.PA) and Kering SA (KER.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACA.PA	KER.PA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.18	0.98	-0.80
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.38	1.64	-1.26
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.19	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.75	1.80	-1.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.34	4.61	-2.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACA.PA vs. KER.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACA.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the KER.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACA.PA and KER.PA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACA.PA	KER.PA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18	0.98	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	-0.37	+0.98
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	0.26	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.31	-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between ACA.PA and KER.PA is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ACA.PA vs. KER.PA - Dividend Comparison

ACA.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, more than KER.PA's 1.99% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACA.PA Crédit Agricole S.A.	6.63%	6.27%	7.90%	8.17%	10.68%	6.37%	0.00%	5.34%	6.68%	4.35%	5.09%	3.22%
KER.PA Kering SA	1.99%	1.99%	5.88%	3.51%	2.52%	1.13%	1.35%	1.79%	1.42%	1.17%	1.88%	2.53%

Drawdowns

ACA.PA vs. KER.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACA.PA drawdown since its inception was -88.79%, roughly equal to the maximum KER.PA drawdown of -85.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACA.PA and KER.PA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACA.PA	KER.PA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.79%	-85.03%	-3.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.69%	-32.30%	+15.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.47%	-78.17%	+41.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.95%	-78.17%	+21.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.85%	-62.43%	+49.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.78%	-30.14%	-8.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.37%	12.59%	-7.22%

Volatility

ACA.PA vs. KER.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crédit Agricole S.A. (ACA.PA) is 8.45%, while Kering SA (KER.PA) has a volatility of 9.87%. This indicates that ACA.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KER.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACA.PA	KER.PA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.45%	9.87%	-1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.67%	28.08%	-12.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.48%	41.26%	-18.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.22%	34.50%	-11.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.72%	32.49%	-3.77%

Financials