PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
KER.PA vs. LVMUY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

KER.PA vs. LVMUY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Kering SA (KER.PA) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (LVMUY).

Performance

KER.PA vs. LVMUY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Kering SA (KER.PA) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (LVMUY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KER.PA vs. LVMUY - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KER.PA
Kering SA		-12.21%30.28%-37.75%-14.00%-31.24%20.44%3.11%45.37%14.15%87.50%
LVMUY
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne		-26.52%4.10%-12.59%10.47%-5.32%44.16%25.68%65.97%6.38%39.90%
Different Trading Currencies

KER.PA is traded in EUR, while LVMUY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LVMUY values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KER.PA achieves a -12.21% return, which is significantly higher than LVMUY's -26.52% return. Over the past 10 years, KER.PA has underperformed LVMUY with an annualized return of 8.66%, while LVMUY has yielded a comparatively higher 14.73% annualized return.

KER.PA

1D
2.57%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
-12.21%
6M
-6.74%
1Y
41.09%
3Y*
-21.63%
5Y*
-12.93%
10Y*
8.66%

LVMUY

1D
-0.20%
1M
-9.21%
YTD
-26.52%
6M
-9.60%
1Y
-15.83%
3Y*
-16.13%
5Y*
-2.21%
10Y*
14.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Kering SA

LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne

Often compared with KER.PA:
KER.PA vs. MC.PAKER.PA vs. RMS.PAKER.PA vs. NESN.SWKER.PA vs. EL.PAKER.PA vs. CFR.SWKER.PA vs. EQQU.LKER.PA vs. SPY
Often compared with LVMUY:
LVMUY vs. MC.PALVMUY vs. RMS.PALVMUY vs. VOOLVMUY vs. ELLVMUY vs. NKE.DELVMUY vs. MSFTLVMUY vs. PVH

Return for Risk

KER.PA vs. LVMUY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
KER.PA
KER.PA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
KER.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KER.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
KER.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
KER.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
KER.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
LVMUY
LVMUY Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LVMUY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVMUY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVMUY Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
LVMUY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVMUY Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KER.PA vs. LVMUY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kering SA (KER.PA) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (LVMUY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

KER.PALVMUYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

-0.47

+1.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.64

-0.51

+2.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.94

+0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

-0.51

+2.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.61

-1.10

+5.71

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KER.PA vs. LVMUY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KER.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the LVMUY Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KER.PA and LVMUY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

KER.PALVMUYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

-0.47

+1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

-0.07

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.51

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.23

+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between KER.PA and LVMUY is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

KER.PA vs. LVMUY - Dividend Comparison

KER.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than LVMUY's 2.65% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KER.PA
Kering SA		1.99%1.99%5.88%3.51%2.52%1.13%1.35%1.79%1.42%1.17%1.88%2.53%
LVMUY
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne		2.65%1.92%2.14%1.65%1.78%0.99%1.64%1.49%2.21%2.67%4.16%12.95%

Drawdowns

KER.PA vs. LVMUY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KER.PA drawdown since its inception was -85.03%, which is greater than LVMUY's maximum drawdown of -77.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KER.PA and LVMUY.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

KER.PALVMUYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.03%

-80.82%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.30%

-31.47%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.17%

-46.56%

-31.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.17%

-46.56%

-31.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.43%

-42.51%

-19.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.14%

-20.39%

-9.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.59%

11.81%

+0.78%

Volatility

KER.PA vs. LVMUY - Volatility Comparison

Kering SA (KER.PA) has a higher volatility of 9.87% compared to LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (LVMUY) at 7.91%. This indicates that KER.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVMUY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

KER.PALVMUYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.87%

7.91%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.08%

21.56%

+6.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.26%

33.57%

+7.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.50%

29.87%

+4.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.49%

29.20%

+3.29%

Financials

KER.PA vs. LVMUY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kering SA and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

Please note, different currencies. KER.PA values in EUR, LVMUY values in USD